Moore v. United States of America

Filing 3

ORDER Transferring Case as Successive Petition by Judge Benjamin H Settle. (TG; cc mailed to petitioner)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 WILLIAM G. MOORE, 11 12 13 Petitioner, CASE NO. C11-5662 (CR95-5415BHS) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 Respondent. ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE AS SUCCESSIVE PETITION 15 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside 18 Sentence/Conviction Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dkt. 1). The Court has considered the 19 motion and the remainder of the file and hereby transfers the motion to the United States 20 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for the reasons stated herein. 21 On August 19, 2010, Petitioner filed a § 2255 motion, which the Court transferred 22 to the Ninth Circuit as a successive petition. See Dkt. 248 (3:95-cr-05415-BHS). On 23 November 17, 2010, and without permission of the Ninth Circuit, Petitioner filed yet 24 another § 2255 motion in this case. Dkt. 1; see also Dkt. 250 (3:95-cr-05415-BHS). On 25 August 19, 2011, Petitioner filed the instant and again successive § 2255 petition without 26 permission of the Ninth Circuit. 27 28 ORDER - 1 1 Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to the 2 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit as a successive petition, and the 3 Clerk of Court shall enter a statistical termination of this case. 4 DATED this 31st day of August, 2011. 5 6 A BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?