Bell v. United States of America

Filing 4

ORDER DISMISSING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Raymond Leo Jarlik Bell, 3 Amended Petition filed by Raymond Leo Jarlik Bell, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 10/5/2011 (DN). (Copy mailed to petitioner.)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 RAYMOND LEO JARLIK BELL, CASE NO. C11-5768RBL 9 Petitioner, ORDER 10 v. 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Respondent. 13 14 THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled court upon a Petition and Amended 15 Petition challenging the jurisdiction of this Court. Having considered the entirety of the records 16 and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows: 17 Raymond Leo Jarlik Bell is currently charged by Indictment with three counts of 18 violating 18 U.S.C. § 287 and 2 for filing false, ficticious and fraudulent claims for refunds of 19 taxes. See CR11-5407RBL. He is represented by counsel. On or about September 22, 2011, a 20 person who is not an attorney attempted to file a petition on his behalf challenging the subject 21 matter jurisdiction of this Court over the criminal case. Mr. Bell did not sign the petition nor is it 22 clear that he is aware that the petition was filed. 23 24 ORDER- 1 1 Non-lawyers may not purport to act on someone else’s behalf. Furthermore, a person 2 represented by counsel cannot appear or act in his own behalf. See GR 2(g)(1), Local Rules of 3 W.D. Wash. Therefore, the Petition and Amended Petition are hereby DISMISSED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any 6 party appearing pro se. 7 Dated this 5th day of October, 2011. 9 A 10 RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?