Slack et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Filing
311
ORDER granting the 308 Motion Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement: Swift to Provide Class Data to Settlement Administrator by 10/16/18, Mailed Notice Date:11/15/18, Exclusion and Objection Deadline: 12/18/18, Fee Petition Deadline: 12/14/18, Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and Responses to Objections Deadline: 1/3/19, and the Fairness Hearing: 10:00 a.m. on 1/22/2019. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(CMG)
1
The Honorable Benjamin H. Settle
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
10
11
12
13
14
15
TROY SLACK, JACOB GRISMER,
RICHARD ERICKSON, SCOTT PRAYE,
GARY H. ROBERTS, ROBERT P.
ULLRICH, HENRY LEDESMA, TIMOTHY
HELMICK, DENNIS STUBER, ERIC
DUBLINSKI, SEAN P. FORNEY,
individually and as Class Representatives,
16
19
No. 3:11-cv-05843-BHS
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT
Plaintiffs,
17
18
CLASS ACTION
v.
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. OF
ARIZONA, LLC,
20
Defendant.
21
22
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Renewed Motion for
23
Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, filed September 20, 2018 (“Renewed
24
Preliminary Approval Motion”). Plaintiff Class Representatives 1 and Defendant Swift
25
Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement
26
27
28
1
The moving class representatives are: Troy Slack, Jacob Grismer, Richard Erickson, Scott Praye, Gary H.
Roberts, Robert P. Ullrich, Timothy Helmick, Dennis Stuber, and Sean Forney. Class representatives Eric Dublinski
and Henry Ledesma died during the pendency of the case.
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 1
Case No. 3:11-cv-05843-BHS
010532-11 1064116 V1
1301 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2000 • SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594
1
and Release, dated September 20, 2017 (“Settlement Agreement”) to settle the above-captioned
2
lawsuit. The Court preliminarily approved the Settlement on October 10, 2017. Dkt. No. 278.
3
But after preliminary approval, the Class Representatives and Swift developed a disagreement
4
about the scope of the Class included in the Settlement Agreement, and the scope of the release
5
of the claims in the Settlement Agreement. Therefore, the Court vacated preliminary approval
6
on April 10, 2018. Dkt. No. 292. The parties briefed the issues between them multiple times.
7
The Court issued an order directing the parties to meet and confer and [to propose a process for
8
moving the matter forward on July 9, 2018]. Dkt. No. 303. After this order, counsel for Class
9
Representatives and Swift met and conferred over the outstanding issues and agreed to resolve
10
them with the clarifications set forth in Amendment No. 1 to Class Action Settlement Agreement
11
and Release, dated August 29, 2018 (“Amendment”). The Settlement Agreement, with the
12
Amendment, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed Settlement and dismissal with
13
prejudice of Swift.
14
The Court has considered the Renewed Preliminary Approval Motion, and the associated
15
Declarations, the Settlement Agreement with the Amendment, the proposed Settlement Notice,
16
and the record in this case. The Court hereby gives its preliminary approval to the Settlement, as
17
amended, and finds that the Settlement is sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate to allow
18
dissemination of notice of the Settlement to the Class and to hold a Fairness Hearing; orders that
19
Settlement Notice be sent to the Class in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, with the
20
Amendment, and this Order, and schedules a Fairness Hearing to determine whether the
21
proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate.
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
23
1.
The Settlement Agreement and the Amendment are hereby incorporated by
24
reference in this Order, and all terms and phrases used in this Order shall have the same meaning
25
as in the Settlement Agreement and the Amendment.
26
27
2.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction to approve the Settlement Agreement
and the Amendment.
28
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 2
Case No. 3:11-cv-05843-BHS
010532-11 1064116 V1
1301 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2000 • SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594
1
3.
The Court preliminarily approves the Settlement Agreement and the Amendment
2
and finds that the proposed Settlement is sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate to warrant
3
providing notice to the Class.
4
4.
The Court appoints Kurtzman Carson Consultants (KCC) as the Settlement
5
Administrator. KCC shall administer the Settlement in accordance with the terms and conditions
6
of this Order and the Settlement Agreement.
7
5.
Settlement Notice. The Court approves the proposed notice plan. The Settlement
8
Administrator, using data supplied by Swift as provided in the Settlement Agreement and the
9
Amendment, will attempt in good faith to identify Class Members’ last known mailing
10
addresses. Class Counsel, by and through the Settlement Administrator, will provide notice of
11
the settlement to Class Members by: (i) First-Class Mail in a form substantially similar to the
12
form attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Derek Smith Regarding Class Action Notice
13
Qualifications and Administration Experience (“Settlement Notice”); and (ii) a content-neutral
14
website that will contain the mailed Settlement Notice, as well as further information about the
15
Settlement, including access to the Agreement itself, as well as certain pleadings (“Settlement
16
Website”).
6.
17
Class Counsel and the Settlement Administrator shall use their best efforts to
18
complete the Class Notice process by the Mailed Notice Date listed in Paragraph 20 of this
19
Order.
20
7.
The Court finds that the procedures outlined in the Settlement Agreement and the
21
Amendment and in the Smith Declaration for identifying potential Class Members and providing
22
notice to them constitute reasonable notice and the best practicable notice under the
23
circumstances and an appropriate and sufficient effort to locate current addresses for potential
24
Class Members such that no additional efforts to do so shall be required.
25
8.
Specifically, the Court finds that Class Members shall be identified by the
26
methodology used by Ms. Angela Sabbe in the Expert Report of Angela Sabbe (dated September
27
15, 2016), as supplement with data provided by Ms. Sabbe in October, 2017, a methodology
28
which was adopted and employed by Class Representatives and Swift in this case.
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 3
Case No. 3:11-cv-05843-BHS
010532-11 1064116 V1
1301 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2000 • SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594
1
9.
The Court finds that the Settlement Notice plan, including the form, content, and
2
method of dissemination of the Settlement Notice to Class Members as described in the
3
Settlement Agreement and in the Vasquez Declaration, (i) is the best practicable notice; (ii) is
4
reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Class Members of the pendency of the
5
Lawsuit and of their right to object to and/or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement;
6
(iii) is reasonable and constitutes due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to
7
receive notice; and (iv) meets all applicable requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23
8
and due process.
9
10.
The Court approves the Plan of Allocation of class settlement funds, as set forth
10
in the Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Notice, and finds that the proposed Plan of
11
Allocation is fair, reasonable, and adequate.
12
11.
Exclusions and Objections. The Court approves the procedures set forth in the
13
Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Notice for exclusions from and objections to the
14
Settlement. Any Class Member who wishes to be excluded from or object to the Settlement
15
must comply with the terms set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Settlement Notice. Class
16
Members who wish to exclude themselves from (“opt out of”) the Settlement must serve on the
17
Administrator, and counsel, a written request for exclusion (“Exclusion Request”) by the
18
Exclusion and Objection Deadline listed in Paragraph 20 of this Order, as provided in the
19
Settlement Notice. Class Counsel shall submit to the Court the name of all Class Members who
20
submit Exclusion Requests at the time Class Counsel file their motion for final approval of the
21
Settlement.
22
12.
All Class Members will be bound by the Judgment dismissing the Lawsuit with
23
prejudice unless such Class Members timely file a valid Exclusion Request. Any Class Member
24
who submits a timely Exclusion Request shall be deemed to have waived any rights or benefits
25
under the Settlement Agreement.
26
13.
The Court preliminarily enjoins all Class Members, unless and until they submit a
27
timely Exclusion Request pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, (i) from filing, commencing,
28
prosecuting, intervening in, or participating as plaintiff, claimant, or class member in any other
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 4
Case No. 3:11-cv-05843-BHS
010532-11 1064116 V1
1301 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2000 • SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594
1
lawsuit or administrative, regulatory, arbitration, or other proceeding in any jurisdiction based on
2
the Released Claims; and (ii) from filing, commencing, or prosecuting a lawsuit or
3
administrative, regulatory, arbitration, or other proceeding as a class action on behalf of any
4
Class Members, based on the Released Claims.
5
14.
Class Members who wish to object to any aspect of the Settlement must file with
6
the Court a written statement containing their objection (“Objection”) by the Exclusion and
7
Objection Deadline listed in Paragraph 20 of this Order, as provided in the Class Notice. Any
8
Settlement Class Member who does not make his or her objection in the manner provided in the
9
Class Notice shall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from
10
making any objection to the fairness or adequacy of the Settlement as set forth in this Settlement
11
Agreement, to the Plan of Allocation, and/or to the award of attorneys’ fees and expenses to
12
Class Counsel.
13
15.
Any attorney hired by, representing, or assisting (including, but not limited to, by
14
drafting or preparing papers for a Class Member) a Class Member for the purpose of objecting to
15
any term or aspect of the Settlement Agreement or to the proposed Settlement or intervening in
16
the Lawsuit shall mail to the Administrator and file with the Clerk of the Court a notice of
17
appearance no later than the Exclusion and Objection Deadline listed in Paragraph 20 of this
18
Order.
19
16.
The Court directs the Administrator promptly to furnish Class Counsel and Swift
20
counsel copies of any and all objections, motions to intervene, notices of intention to appear, and
21
other communications that come into its possession (except as otherwise expressly provided in
22
the Settlement Agreement).
23
17.
The Court stays all proceedings against Swift in the Lawsuit until further order of
24
the Court, except that the Parties may conduct such limited proceedings as may be necessary to
25
implement the proposed Settlement or to effectuate its terms.
26
18.
Class Counsel shall file a petition for fees, expenses, and incentive awards by the
27
Fee Petition Deadline listed in Paragraph 20 of this Order. Class Counsel shall file a motion for
28
final approval and responses to any objections/Fee Petition replies by the Motion for Final
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 5
Case No. 3:11-cv-05843-BHS
010532-11 1064116 V1
1301 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2000 • SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594
1
Approval of Settlement and Responses to Objections Deadline listed in Paragraph 20 of this
2
Order.
3
19.
The Fairness Hearing shall be held at the date and time listed in Paragraph 20 of
4
this Order, for the purpose of determining (a) whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and
5
adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; (b) the merit of any objections to the
6
Settlement; (c) the requested Fee and Expense Award to Class Counsel; (d) the requested
7
Incentive Awards to the Settlement Class Representatives; and (e) entry of the District Court
8
Approval Order and Judgment approving the Settlement.
9
20.
The Court directs that the following deadlines are established by this Order. The
10
Court may, for good cause, extend any of the deadlines set forth in this Order without further
11
notice to the Class.
12
a.
13
(within 7 days following entry of this Order)
14
b.
15
(within 30 days following receipt of class data)
16
c.
17
(within 33 days following Mailed Notice Date)
18
d.
19
(by 14 days before the Exclusion and Objection Deadline)
20
e.
21
Swift to Provide Class Data to Settlement Administrator: 10/16/2018
Mailed Notice Date: 11/15/2018
Exclusion and Objection Deadline: 12/18/2018
Fee Petition Deadline: 12/14/2018
Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and Responses to Objections
Deadline: 1/3/2019
22
(two weeks after objection deadline/at least 2 weeks prior to the Fairness Hearing)
23
f.
24
(at least 100 days after the date of this Order)
25
21.
Fairness Hearing: 10:00 AM on 1/22/2019
The Court reserves the right to adjourn, continue or otherwise change the date of
26
the Fairness Hearing without further notice to the members of the Settlement Class, and retains
27
jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the proposed
28
Settlement Agreement. The members of the Settlement Class are advised to confirm the date of
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 6
Case No. 3:11-cv-05843-BHS
010532-11 1064116 V1
1301 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2000 • SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594
1
the Fairness Hearing as set forth in the Settlement Notice. The Court may approve the
2
Settlement Agreement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the settling parties, if
3
appropriate, without further notice to the Settlement Class.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated this 9th day of October, 2018
7
A
8
9
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
Presented by:
14
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
15
By:
By:
By:
22
/s/ Steve W. Berman
/s/ Thomas E. Loeser
/s/ Jeniphr Breckenridge
Steve W. Berman, WSBA #12536
Thomas E. Loeser, WSBA# 38701
Jeniphr Breckenridge, WSBA #21410
1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
steve@hbsslaw.com
toml@hbsslaw.com
jeniphr@hbsslaw.com
23
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
18
19
20
21
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 7
Case No. 3:11-cv-05843-BHS
010532-11 1064116 V1
1301 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 2000 • SEATTLE, WA 98101
(206) 623-7292 • FAX (206) 623-0594
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?