Williams v. Risk Management Division et al

Filing 9

ORDER denying 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 12/8/2011 (DN). (Copy mailed to plaintiff.)

1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

7
8

LEROY WILLIAMS BEY,

CASE NO. C11-5873 RBL

9
Plaintiff,

ORDER

10
v.
11
RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION,
12
Defendant.
13
14

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to

15 Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. #8]. Having considered the entirety of the records and file
16 herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:
17

On November 21, 2011, this Court entered an Order Adopting the Report and

18 Recommendation [Dkt. #7] denying Plaintiff’s first Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The
19 Motion was denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because on “three or more occasions
20 Plaintiff has had cases dismissed for failure to state a claim or as frivolous.” [Report and
21 Recommendation, Dkt. #4, p. 2]. To the extent this current Motion is a Motion for
22 Reconsideration, the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. #8] is DENIED. CR 7(h),
23 Local Rules W.D. Wash.
24
ORDER- 1

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any

3 party appearing pro se.
4

Dated this 8th day of December, 2011.

6

A

7

RONALD B. LEIGHTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER- 2