McNearney v. Washington Department of Corrections et al

Filing 48

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 47 Granting Defendants' Motion for Modification of Court's Injunction Order 44 , signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 JILL McNEARNEY, No. C11-5930 RBL/KLS 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DR. STEVEN HAMMOND, 11 12 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen 13 L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 does hereby find and ORDER: (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation and GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Modification of Court’s Injunction Order. ECF No. 44. (2) The Court modifies the Injunction Order (ECF No. 27) on page 28 (adopted by Order at ECF No. 36), as follows: 5) If the Defendants do not oppose the treatment recommendation by the foot and ankle specialist at the Foot and Ankle Institute at Harborview Medical Center, the Defendants shall authorize, perform, and/or facilitate the recommended treatment should Ms. McNearney elect to have the recommended surgical procedure while she is in the custody of the Department of Corrections. 6) This order will automatically terminate upon the release of the Plaintiff from the Department of Corrections’ custody. 25 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 1 2 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom. 3 4 DATED this 31st day of January, 2013. 5 6 7 8 A Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?