Davis v. Astrue
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS, re 20 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
11
DORA DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
CASE NO. C11-6023 RJB
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION REVERSING
AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security,
15
Defendant.
16
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate
17
Judge Karen L. Strombom. Dkt. 20. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the
18
Commissioner’s decision to deny supplemental security income benefits be reversed and this
19
matter remanded for further administrative proceedings. Id. No objections have been filed to the
20
Report and Recommendation.
21
The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of
22
Judge Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does
23
hereby find and ORDER:
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND
REMANDING FOR FURTHER
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS- 1
1
(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 20);
2
(2) The ALJ erred in her decision as described in the Report and Recommendation;
3
(3) The matter is therefore REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for
4
5
6
7
further administrative proceedings; and
(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff’s counsel, Defendant’s
counsel and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.
DATED this 15th day of October, 2012.
A
8
9
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND
REMANDING FOR FURTHER
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?