Davis v. Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS, re 20 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 DORA DAVIS, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 CASE NO. C11-6023 RJB v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate 17 Judge Karen L. Strombom. Dkt. 20. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the 18 Commissioner’s decision to deny supplemental security income benefits be reversed and this 19 matter remanded for further administrative proceedings. Id. No objections have been filed to the 20 Report and Recommendation. 21 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of 22 Judge Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does 23 hereby find and ORDER: 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS- 1 1 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 20); 2 (2) The ALJ erred in her decision as described in the Report and Recommendation; 3 (3) The matter is therefore REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for 4 5 6 7 further administrative proceedings; and (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff’s counsel, Defendant’s counsel and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom. DATED this 15th day of October, 2012. A 8 9 ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?