Nelson v. Pacholke et al

Filing 69

ORDER granting Defendants' 67 Motion to File Sealed/Redacted Records and the 68 Declaration of Andrea Vingo in Support of the Motion shall remain sealed, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (GMR- cc: pltf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 7 EDWARD JOSEPH NELSON, Plaintiff, v. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DAN PACHOLKE, PAT GLEBE, RON FRAKER, WILLIAM ROLLINS, S. OBENLAND, KATHY RENINGER, PRICE M. CHENAULT, J. DAVID KENNEY, CRC COMMITTEE STAFFORD CREEK MEDICAL, CLIFFORD J. JOHNSON, SHARON MORGAN, DAVE SIMS, M. HOLTHE, CRC COMMITTEE CBCC, and G. PRESSEL, 17 18 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL Defendants. 15 16 No. C12-5048 RBL/KLS Defendants filed a Motion to File Sealed/Redacted medical records of Plaintiff. ECF No. 67. The defendants conferred with the Plaintiff and he has agreed to the request. The Court finds that the Plaintiff’s privacy concerns regarding his medical condition support granting the 19 Defendant’s request and therefore finds that the Defendants have shown good cause. 20 21 22 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1) Defendants’ Motion to File Sealed/Redacted Records with their summary 23 judgment motion and supporting documents and to seal the Declaration of Andrea Vingo in 24 Support of the Motion to Seal/Redact (ECF No. 67) is GRANTED. 25 26 2) The Clerk will see to it that the Declaration of Andrea Vingo in Support of the Motion to Seal/Redact (ECF No. 68) shall remain sealed. ORDER - 1 1 2 3) The Defendants’ are allowed to file a redacted summary judgment motion and supporting documents. 3 4) 4 DATED this 16th day of April, 2013. The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. 5 A 6 7 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?