Richey v. Dahne

Filing 5

ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class Mail; mailed on 2/6/12 to Defendant; General Order sent to Pltf., signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (MET) cc: plaintiff w/courtesy copy to Pierce County Prosecutor.

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 THOMAS W. S. RICHEY, 6 7 8 Plaintiff, No. C12-5060 BHS/KLS v. ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT D. DAHNE, 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 This is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed with this action in forma pauperis. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 13 (l) 14 The Clerk is directed to send the following to the named defendants by first class mail: a 15 16 Service by Clerk copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint, a copy of this Order, two copies of the Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, a Waiver of Service of Summons, and a return 17 18 envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to the Clerk’s Office. 19 (2) Response Required 20 Defendants shall have thirty (30) days within which to return the enclosed waiver of 21 service of summons. A defendant who timely returns a signed waiver shall have sixty (60) days 22 after the date designated on the notice of lawsuit to file and serve an answer to the complaint or a 23 motion permitted under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 24 A defendant who fails to timely return a signed waiver will be personally served with a 25 26 summons and complaint, and may be required to pay the full costs of such service, pursuant to ORDER - 1 1 Rule 4(d)(2). A defendant who has been personally served shall file an answer or motion 2 permitted under Rule 12 within thirty (30) days after service. 3 4 (3) Filing and Service by Parties, Generally All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents 5 electronically via the court’s CM/ECF system. Counsel are directed to the court’s website, 6 7 www.wawd.uscourts.gov, for a detailed description of the requirements for filing via CM/ECF. 8 All non-attorneys, such as pro se parties and/or prisoners, may continue to file a paper original 9 with the Clerk. All filings, whether filed electronically or in traditional paper format, must 10 indicate in the upper right hand corner the name of the Magistrate Judge to whom the document 11 is directed. 12 For any party filing electronically, when the total of all pages of a filing exceeds fifty 13 (50) pages in length, a paper copy of the document (with tabs or other organizing aids as 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 necessary) shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office for chambers. The chambers copy must be clearly marked with the works “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers.” Finally, any document filed with the court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. (4) Motions Regarding the filing of motions before the court, the parties are directed to review Local 21 22 23 Rule CR 7 in its entirety. A few important points are highlighted below: Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. 24 Pursuant to amended Local Rule CR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion 25 shall be submitted as a part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion 26 ORDER - 2 1 shall include in its caption (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the 2 date the motion is to be noted for consideration upon the court's motion calendar. 3 4 In all instances where one of the parties to a lawsuit is incarcerated, all categories of nondispositive motions not listed in Local Rule CR 7(d)(1) must be noted for the third Friday after 5 the date of filing and service. This applies to all non-dispositive motions, even those which are 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 normally (if none of the parties are incarcerated) permitted to be noted 7 judicial days after filing. See Local Rule CR 7(d)(2). All dispositive motions shall be noted for consideration no earlier than the fourth Friday following filing and service of the motion. (5) Motions for Summary Judgment If one of the parties files a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of 13 Civil Procedure 56, the opposing party should acquaint him/herself with Rule 56. Rule 56 14 15 requires a nonmoving party to submit affidavits or other evidence in opposition to a motion for 16 summary judgment if the moving party has shown the absence of issues of material fact and an 17 entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. A nonmoving party may not rest upon the mere 18 allegations or denials of prior pleadings. Rather, successful opposition to a motion for summary 19 judgment requires the nonmoving party to set forth, through affidavits or other evidence, specific 20 facts showing a genuine issue for trial. Failure by the nonmoving party to oppose a summary 21 22 judgment motion or to present counter evidence could result in the court accepting the moving 23 party’s evidence as the truth, and entering final judgment in favor of the moving party without a 24 full trial. Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520 (9th Cir. 1997). 25 26 ORDER - 3 1 (6) 2 No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with 3 4 Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk. (7) Clerk’s Action 5 The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order and of the General Order issued by the 6 7 8 Magistrate Judges to Plaintiffs. The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order and a courtesy copy of Plaintiffs’ Complaint to the Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office. 9 DATED this 6th day of February, 2012. 10 A 11 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?