Holtz v. Karr

Filing 17

ORDER granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. Plaintiff must show cause or file his amended complaint on or before July 11, 2012.(MET) cc: plaintiff w/docket numbers 13 and 15.

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 5 6 7 8 RON HOLTZ, No. C12-5111 RJB/KLS Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 SUSAN KARR, 10 Defendant. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 By Order dated May 22, 2012, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed or, alternatively to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in the Court’s order. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff was given a deadline to amend or show cause by June 22, 2012. Id. On June 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time. ECF No.16. He states that he discussed his case with an attorney, Kent Underwood, who took all of his relevant documents to review on May 25, 2012, but who has not returned his calls or returned his documents since that time. Id. Plaintiff has been unable to comply with the Court’s Order without his documents. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED. Plaintiff must show cause or file his amended complaint on or before July 11, 2012. Plaintiff is cautioned that if he fails to show cause or amend his complaint by July 11, 2012, the Court will recommend dismissal of this action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 25 26 ORDER TO AMEND OR SHOW CAUSE- 1 1 (2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 13) and 2 the Court’s Order to Amend or Show Cause (ECF No. 15) to Plaintiff along with a copy of this 3 Order. 4 5 DATED this 18th day of June, 2012. A 6 7 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER TO AMEND OR SHOW CAUSE- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?