Wright v. Astrue

Filing 31

ORDER granting 28 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 LARRY D. WRIGHT, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(B) CAROLYN W. COLVIN ,Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 CASE NO. 12-5284 RJB Defendant. 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Authorization of Attorney 17 Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. 28. The Court has considered the pleadings filed regarding 18 the motion and the record herein. 19 Attorney's fees may be awarded to a successful social security claimant's lawyer for his 20 or her representation before a court pursuant 42 U.S.C. §§ 406(b); Straw v. Bowen, 866 F.2d 21 1167 (9th Cir. 1989). Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) the court can only award fees up to the 25 22 percent withheld from the past-due benefits. This 25 percent limit applies to the total of EAJA 23 and § 406(b) fees combined. See, Morris v. Social Sec. Admin., 689 F.2d 495, 497-98 (4th Cir. 24 ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(B)- 1 1 1982); Webb v. Richardson, 472 F.2d 529, 536 (6th Cir. 1972); Dawson v. Finch, 425 F.2d 1192, 2 1195 (5th Cir. 1970). Previously, this Court awarded Plaintiff’s counsel the amount of $3,314.27 3 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). The award of § 406(b) fees that Plaintiff’s 4 attorney seeks, $12,001.25 is the balance before the EAJA award is subtracted from the 25% of 5 the past due benefits award. Plaintiff acknowledges in his motion that his counsel is obligated to 6 refund the EAJA award to him. 7 The Commissioner filed a response, and does not object to an award of § 406(b) fees, but 8 argues that an award from the Court should be for the net award of $8,686.98. Dkt. 29. That is 9 award $12,001.25 less the EAJA award of $3,314.27 to the Plaintiff’s counsel. Id. 10 “Congress harmonized fees payable by the Government under EAJA with fees payable 11 under § 406(b) out of the claimant's past-due Social Security benefits” in 1985. Gisbrecht v. 12 Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002). “Fee awards may be made under both prescriptions, but the 13 claimant's attorney must ‘refun[d] to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.’” Id. (quoting 14 Public Law 99–80, §3,99 Stat. 183, 186 (1985)(uncodified), which provides, “where the 15 claimant's attorney receives fees for the same work under both section 206(b) . . . and section 16 2412(d) of title 28, United States Code, the claimant's attorney refunds to the claimant the 17 amount of the smaller fee.”). 18 Based on the statutory scheme, then, Plaintiff’s attorney should be awarded $12,001.25 in 19 fees. Plaintiff’s attorney should refund to Plaintiff the EAJA award of $3,314.27. 20 21 22 Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED:  Plaintiff’s Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Dkt. 28) IS GRANTED; 23 24 ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(B)- 2 1  2 3 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).  4 5 Plaintiff’s attorney, Robert Friedman, is awarded attorney’s fee of $12,001.25 Mr. Friedman shall refund to Plaintiff the EAJA fees of $3,314.27 that were previously were awarded, leaving a net fee of $8,686.98; and  When issuing the 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiff’s attorney, 6 the Government is directed to send to Plaintiff’s attorney $12,001.25, minus any 7 applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. 8 Dated this 3rd day of January, 2017. 9 A 10 ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(B)- 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?