Hunchan Company v. Gerbings Heated Clothing, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER granting 6 Motion to change venue. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 6/6/2012. (RH) [Transferred from flmd on 6/7/2012.]

Download PDF
,~. .. , FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ZOi2 JU~i -7 PH I: .S? . JACKSONVILLE DIVISION I. CLERi';, iJ3 015 ·d~iCT COURT HUNCHAN COMPANY, a foreign corporation, H!ODLE DISTRICT OF FL -'AC~~:~~"!VP,' :: FIO~ilflA Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3: 12-cv-306-HES-JBT GERDING'S HEATED CLOTHING, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendant. ________________________ ~I ORDER This cause is before this Court on Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. 6, filed March 28,2012). In this pleading, Defendant, invoking 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), seeks transfer ofthis case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Upon due consideration, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED. On balance, the plaintiff's initial choice of forum, the convenience of the parties and witnesses, the relative ease of access to sources of proof, the availability of compulsory process for witnesses, the location of relative documents, the parties' ability to bear the cost of the change in venue, and other practical considerations that will make trial of this case easy, expeditious, and inexpensive weigh strongly in favor ofa transfer of venue to the Western District of Washington. Most of the events giving rise to this litigation-the placing of orders for product, the manufacture of product, the shipping of product, and the making of payments-occurred between Tumwater, Washington, and Hong Kong, China. The only event related to this litigation that occurred in Jacksonville, Florida was a brief meeting between a representative of Defendant and a representative of Plaintiff in an attempt to settle this dispute; the rest of the parties' relevant dealings occurred in Tumwater, Washington, and Hong Kong, China. Defendant is a Washington • ... 1) corporation with its principal place of business in Tumwater, Washington, and most of Defendant's witnesses reside in Washington. None of Defendant's witnesses resides in Florida. Plaintiff is a Chinese corporation, and while one of its main witnesses resides in Jacksonville, Florida, its other main witness resides in China. The bulk of the documents related to this litigation-purchase orders, invoices, and payment records-originated in Tumwater, Washington and Hong Kong, China. Indeed, the only considerations that weigh against a change of venue are that one of Plaintiff's main witnesses resides in Florida and the events underlying Count IV of the Complaint-events that represent only a small fraction of the relevant dealings between the parties-occurred in Jacksonville, Florida. These considerations pale in comparison to those favoring a change of venue. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 1. Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. 6) is GRANTED; and 2. The Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this case to the Western District of Washington. DONE AND ENTERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this U a y of June, 2012. Copies to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington Gavin C. Gaukroger, Esq., Attorney for Defendant Michel O. Weisz, Esq., Attorney for Defendant John R. Stiefel, Jr., Esq., Attorney for Plaintiff 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?