Bury v. NCS Power Inc.,et al
Filing
163
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting 155 Motion to Amend. Counsel is directed to e-file their Amended Complaint. (TG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JOHN F. BURY, WSBA No. 4949
TIMOTHY R. FISCHER, WSBA No. 40075
SCOTT A. GINGRAS, WSBA No. 43886
WINSTON & CASHATT, LAWYERS
601 W. Riverside Avenue, Suite 1900
Spokane, WA 99201
Telephone: (509) 838-6131
Facsimile: (509) 838-1416
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Honorable Benjamin H. Settle
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
11
In Re:
Case No. 3:12-cv-05641-BHS
ROBERT F. BURY,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
THE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
NCS POWER, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Plaintiff Bury’s unopposed Motion
and Memorandum to Amend the Fourth Amended Complaint, and the Court having considered
the pleadings filed in support of the Motion, the Court grants the Motion and permits the
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff to amend the Fourth Amended Complaint to:
1.
Add existing Defendant Wade Au to Plaintiff’s existing Second Claim for Relief
under RCW 49.52.010, et seq (a Washington state law wage claim; and
24
25
26
27
28
2.
Conform the pleading with the Court’s recent Order on Motions for Summary
Judgment (ECF #144).
Therefore, the Court grants Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion to amend the Fourth Amended
Complaint.
29
30
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
THE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 3:12-cv-05641-BHS .- 1
1
2
The Plaintiff shall file an amended Complaint (Fourth Amended Complaint) no later
than May 27, 2014.
3
4
DATED this 27th day of May, 2014.
5
A
6
7
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
Presented by:
WINSTON & CASHATT, LAWYERS
/s/ Timothy R. Fischer
__________________________________
TIMOTHY R. FISCHER, WSBA No. 40075
Attorneys for Plaintiff
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
THE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 3:12-cv-05641-BHS .- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?