Ancich et al v. Professional Choice Sports Medicine Products, Inc

Filing 31

ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle granting 23 Motion for New Trial. Jury Trial is reset for 4/29/2014 at 09:00 AM before Judge Benjamin H Settle, and clerk will issue a revised scheduling order.(TG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 DAWN ANCICH and PETER ANCICH, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 v. 11 PROFESSIONAL CHOICE SPORTS MEDICINE PRODUCTS, INC, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 CASE NO. C12-6033 BHS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONTINUE 14 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Dawn and Peter Ancich’s 15 (“Anciches”) motion to continue trial and pretrial dates (Dkt. 23). 16 On April 17, 2013, the Court issued a scheduling order setting the trial date and 17 pretrial deadlines. Dkt. 17. On September 26, 2013, the Anciches filed a motion to 18 continue and requested a three-month extension of the trial date and pretrial deadlines. 19 Dkt. 23. On October 2, 2013, Defendants responded and opposed the extension. Dkt. 24. 20 On October 4, 2013, the Anciches replied. Dkt. 27. 21 22 ORDER - 1 1 Upon review of the briefs and the parties’ submissions, the Court finds that there 2 is good cause to continue trial and some pretrial deadlines. With regard to experts, the 3 Court finds that there is not good cause to disclose additional experts. However, the 4 experts that have been disclosed can supplement their disclosures as provided in the 5 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. With regard to the other dates, the Court grants the 6 requested extensions. Therefore, the Court GRANTS the Anciches’ motion and trial is 7 hereby set for April 29, 2014. The Clerk shall issue a new abbreviated scheduling order 8 based on the new trial date. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 21st day of October, 2013. A 11 12 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?