Cyndi's List, et al v. Mygenshare.com, et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES, TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE, UNJUST ENTRICHMENT, AND EQUITABLE RELIEF against defendant(s) All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-3055326), filed by Cyndi's List.(Abolins, Talis) Modified on 12/26/2012 to remove caps from filer's name (PM).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TACOMA DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CYNDI’S LIST,
a dba of CYNTHIA HOWELLS, and
CYNTHIA HOWELLS, an
individual,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
MYGENSHARE.COM, LLC, a Utah
limited liability company, and
BARRY J. EWELL, an individual,
Defendant(s).
Case No. ____________
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT, UNFAIR
TRADE PRACTICES, TORTIOUS
INTERFERENCE, UNJUST
ENRICHMENT, AND EQUITABLE
RELIEF
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMES NOW Plaintiff, CYNDI’S LIST and CYNTHIA HOWELLS, and
21
22
by this Complaint seeks money damages and equitable relief against
23
Defendants MYGENSHARE.COM, LLC and BARRY J. EWELL for: (1)
24
copyright infringement; (2) unfair trade practices in violation of Washington’s
25
Consumer Protection Act; (3) tortious interference; and (4) unjust enrichment,
26
and other equitable relief, and alleges as follows:
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 1
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
2
3
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action This
Court has Federal Question jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
§§ 1331 and 1338 as an action arising under the laws of the United States,
including Title 17 of the United States Code relating to copyrights.
2.
This Court has pendent jurisdiction over the state claims under
28 U.S.C. § 1338(b) in that said claims are joined with substantial and related
claims under the Copyright Laws of the United States, Title 17 United States
Code. This Court also has supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
12
1367. Pursuant to Rule 9(c), Plaintiff pleads that all acts and conditions
13
precedent for establishing jurisdiction have been performed or have occurred.
14
15
16
3.
Venue and personal jurisdiction are proper in this district
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c), and, pursuant to
17
FRCP 4, Washington’s long arm jurisdictional rules and statutes in that
18
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that Defendant(s)
19
reside in this district and/or can be found in this district by virtue of their
20
activities, are engaged in substantial and not isolated activities in this district,
21
22
and engaged in acts in this district and/or injured persons in this district in
23
conjunction with activities carried on within this district by Defendants and/or
24
in the ordinary course of trade of Defendants.
25
26
4.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants by virtue of Defendants
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 2
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
2
3
transacting and doing business in this judicial district.
5.
Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendants have contacted
Washington residents seeking advertising for Defendants website on
4
5
Washington residents’ internet sites; that Defendants operate online highly
6
interactive
7
internationally, and to the State of Washington; that Defendants operate
8
online digital subscriptions services that take subscriptions and payment from
9
10
11
webstores
that
take
orders
from
and
ship
nationally,
and grant access to national and international entities, including entities in
the State of Washington; that Defendants conduct business with Washington
12
residents; and that Defendants have otherwise by their activity submitted to
13
the jurisdiction of the State of Washington.
14
15
16
PARTIES
6.
CYNDI’S LIST. Plaintiff, CYNTHIA HOWELLS maintains a
17
professional website addressed to genealogy under the sole proprietorship
18
name of CYNDI’S LIST, with principal place of business in Edgewood,
19
Washington.
20
21
22
7.
MYGENSHARE.COM LLC. Plaintiff is informed and believes
and on that basis alleges that Defendant MYGENSHARE.COM, LLC is a
23
Utah limited liability company, conducting business nationwide including in
24
the State of Washington, and by such extensive conduct, residing in the State
25
of Washington, including by, among other things, contacting Washington
26
residents and Washington based websites for advertising on Washington
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 3
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
based websites, operating on line store(s) and subscription(s) addressed to
2
Washington residents.
3
8.
BARRY J. EWELL. Plaintiff is informed and believes and on
4
5
that basis alleges that Defendant BARRY J. EWELL is the owner, operator,
6
and principal of MYGENSHARE.COM LLC, that he operates and maintains
7
the www.mygenshare.com website, and that he dominates, controls, and
8
otherwise is the principal actor in the offending, infringing, tortious, and
9
10
illegal actions complained of herein.
COMMON ALLEGATIONS OF FACT
11
9.
12
Plaintiff CYNDI’S LIST is a professional genealogy website,
13
having address www.cyndislist.com, that has been operating since March 4,
14
1996.
15
16
It is a comprehensive resource for genealogical research, with
categorization and organization that is extremely creative and unique to
17
CYNDI’S LIST, different from other genealogical research websites.
18
CYNDI’S LIST is continually updated.
19
claimed on the website and its related works since inception.
20
registration protection is continually updated.
21
22
Copyright protection has been
Copyright
Copyright registrations
and/or copyright registration applications have been secured and/or applied
23
for every year from 1997 through 2012, on at least a yearly basis. The first
24
copyright was filed and registered in 1997.
25
appeared on the site since inception.
Copyright statements have
26
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 4
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
2
3
10.
Plaintiff was and is the sole owner of her copyrighted work in the
www.cyndislist.com website (hereinafter “Copyrighted Work”). Plaintiff holds
Copyright Registration No. TXu000787268 and TX 7615575 for the CYNDI’S
4
5
LIST website including the comprehensive, categorized and cross-referenced
6
compilation of internet links that point to genealogical research sites online, as
7
well as other pending or issued registrations. CYNDI’S LIST website gives a
8
clear notice of the existence of the copyright registration.
9
10
11
In addition
CYNDI’S LIST holds Copyright Registration No.’s TX0005399878 and
TX000426087 for CYNDI’S LIST books.
These books also include prior
12
compilations of the copyright materials included on the CYNDI’S LIST
13
website.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
11.
Plaintiff has also applied for registration for, and or received
registration on, its website for each year from 1997 through 2012.
12.
Plaintiff’s copyright registration(s) are prima facie evidence of
the validity, ownership, and originality of her Copyrighted Work.
13.
People accessing CYNDI’S LIST are notified of the copyright
claimed in the work.
14.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
Defendants copied Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work.
15.
Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendants were aware of
25
Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work, accessed Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work numerous
26
times, and, despite the copyright notice, willfully copied Plaintiff’s
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 5
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
Copyrighted Work and incorporated Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work in
2
Defendants’ competing website www.mygenshare.com.
3
16.
Defendants maintain a competing genealogical research website
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
for profit. Defendant’s website competes with Plaintiff’s website.
17.
Defendant’s copying of Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work was done for
profit and is in no guise a fair use of Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work.
18.
Defendants gave a public presentation in 2012
at a
Genealogical Society Jamboree in which Defendants admitted to accessing and
reviewing Plaintiff’s’ Copyrighted Work.
Defendants admitted in a 2007
presentation accessing Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work numerous times.
19.
Defendants’ copying of Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Work is obvious
throughout the Defendants’ links directory. Examples include the word for
word heading and category arrangements throughout Defendants’ links
17
directory. Other obvious examples are that the broken links within CYNDI’S
18
LIST are the same broken links within Defendants’ links for the same
19
directory items. Defendants make a point in its live-streaming webinar from a
20
2012 genealogical jamboree that it developed its own links directory and
21
22
thereby avoided the broken links that were within CYNDI’S LIST and other
23
genealogy reference sites. The fact that the broken links are identical from one
24
to the other is an obvious sign of copying.
25
26
20.
The Copyrighted Work in CYNDI’S LIST website, including the
unique information and compilations of information on Plaintiffs’ website,
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 6
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
were created personally by Cyndi Howells. Plaintiff started her website in
2
1996, and over the last 16 years has, in fact, started from scratch and built her
3
compilation in a unique manner and style. Every affiliate link on CYNDI’S
4
5
LIST was hand created by Ms. Howells. She visited the affiliate website,
6
found the page/material/database to link to, confirmed the categorizations,
7
wrote the code, inserted her affiliate ID number, and applied an appropriate
8
item description for each link. This from-scratch effort was done one-by-one
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
and not through an automated process. For example, more than 12 years ago
CYNDI’S LIST made a specific set of Amazon.com affiliate links with a specific
title and specific parameters.
21.
Defendants illegally copied Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Work and
then changed the affiliate codes—with, for example the name of Amazon.com
stripped out and CYNDI’S LIST own affiliate ID replaced with that of
17
Defendants’ affiliate account. There are many other examples of this same
18
copying, stripping, and publishing on the Defendants’ website. It would be
19
impossible for this to happen if Defendants created its list on its own.
20
Defendants copied CYNDI’S LIST Copyrighted Work, inserted its own affiliate
21
22
23
24
25
account numbers into those links created by CYNDI’S LIST, and is using those
links in its affiliate relationships for profit.
22.
On October 31, 2012, Plaintiff transmitted to Defendants a
Notice of Infringement.
26
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 7
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
2
3
23.
In response, Defendants did little to change titles and names of
its categories. In many cases, Defendants simply lopped off several words
and added the phrase “and related” to make a new title. CYNDI’S LIST
4
5
includes numerous categories of titles that are entirely unique to CYNDI’S
6
LIST and were created by Cyndi Howells over the many years that she has
7
worked on her website and list. Many names are non-traditional genealogical
8
titles and topics, but they are copies word for word onto the Defendants’
9
10
11
website links directory. These titles have been witnessed by professionals in
the field of genealogy prior to Defendants changing of those titles after
12
receiving Plaintiffs’ October 31, 2012 Notice of Infringement. Also, copies of
13
the original titles have been made as proof of the exact duplication of those
14
found on CYNDI’S LIST and the resulting alteration after being notified by
15
16
17
CYNDI’S LIST of the copyright infringement.
24.
Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
18
as a result of the copying of CYNDI’S LIST and its hundreds of thousands of
19
links, categories, and subcategories, Defendants have diverted, and will
20
continue to divert, people from CYNDI’S LIST to Defendants’ website for
21
22
financial gain. Persons searching on an exact link title or category found on
23
CYNDI’S LIST will also receive Defendants’ website as a search hit for that
24
same category. Defendants’ intentions in this matter are clearly to divert
25
internet traffic away from CYNDI’S LIST and create new subscription
26
customers for Defendants’ site and revenues from Defendants’ affiliate
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 8
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
contracts. At the same time this is taking income and revenue away from
2
CYNDI’S LIST’s affiliate contracts and otherwise from Plaintiffs’ website
3
25.
Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
4
5
Defendants copied, published and publicly displayed the Copyrighted Work,
6
and/or unauthorized derivative works created from the Copyrighted Work, in
7
Washington, and throughout the United States and internationally.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
26.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
Defendants used Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work, without permission, to sell
Defendants’ goods and/or services, and did not attribute that work to Plaintiff,
and instead altered and removed attribution to Plaintiff.
27.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
Defendants are sophisticated internet designers and webhosts and are aware
of U.S. copyright laws and the consequences for willful copy of the Copyrighted
17
Work of another. Defendants themselves prominently display copyright
18
statements on their website, showing their sophisticated knowledge and the
19
willfulness of their illicit copying.
20
21
22
28.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
Defendants altered all affiliate links in the illegally copied Copyrighted Work
23
to commercial sites such as Ancestry.com and Amazon.com, removed
24
Plaintiff’s affiliate code and inserted Defendants’ own. This is also a violation
25
of the terms of use for each of the affiliate and a clear violation of the terms of
26
use for Google AdSense terms.
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 9
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
2
3
29.
Plaintiff is entitled to compensation to the extent possible for
damages, general and special, consequential, and incidental, in an amount to
be proven at trial, for the harm caused by Defendant, and for attorneys’ fees,
4
5
6
costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest.
30.
Plaintiff has suffered and likely will suffer immediate irreparable
7
damage and ongoing harm by reasons of Defendants’ unlawful acts unless
8
Defendants are restrained and enjoined, and Plaintiff is without adequate
9
10
11
remedy at law.
31.
Defendants’ unlawful activities caused, and likely will continue
12
to cause, irreparable harm to Plaintiff, which cannot be fully compensated by
13
money damages.
14
32.
15
16
The public has an overriding interest in avoiding unlawful
copying of the work of artists and in the enforcement of copyright and trade
17
practices laws, and in the proper attribution of source and association for
18
goods and services in commerce.
19
20
21
22
23
24
33.
Accordingly, Plaintiff demands an amount of money damages to
compensate the Plaintiff for the harm caused, including but not limited to
Defendants’ profits, statutory and/or punitive damages, as well as equitable
relief, attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest.
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF--COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
25
34.
Plaintiff re-alleges every paragraph in this Complaint.
26
35.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 10
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
by its aforesaid conduct Defendants willfully infringed Plaintiff’s Copyrighted
2
Works; that Defendants’ actions willfully and for profit violated exclusive
3
rights of the Copyright Laws of the United States; that Plaintiff owned valid
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
copyright on works which Defendants violated in acts of improper
appropriation.
36.
Accordingly, Defendants are liable to Plaintiff for statutory
damages, and/or actual damages, including Defendants’ profits, at Plaintiff’s
election, and Defendants should be enjoined to remove from their website all
Copyrighted Work of Plaintiff, including Defendants’ link directory.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF—UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES
13
37.
Plaintiff re-alleges every paragraph in this Complaint.
14
38.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
15
16
Defendant, by its aforesaid conduct, committed unfair trade practices in
17
violation of Washington’s Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86 et seq., that
18
Defendants willfully engaged in practices and acts that cause likelihood of
19
confusion or of misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or
20
certification of Defendants’ goods or services and/or as to affiliation,
21
22
connection, or association with, or certification by, Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s
23
products and/or that represent Defendants’ goods to have sponsorship or
24
approval that they do not have or a status, qualification, affiliation, or
25
connection that Defendants do not have.
26
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 11
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
2
3
39.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
Defendants’ unlawful acts were and are knowing, willful, and malicious.
40.
Plaintiff is entitled to compensation to the extent possible in
4
5
damages, general and special, consequential, and incidental, in an amount to
6
be proven at trial, for the harm caused by Defendant, and for attorneys’ fees,
7
costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
41.
Plaintiff has and will suffer immediate irreparable damage and
ongoing harm to its business, reputation, and goodwill by reasons of
Defendants’ unlawful acts unless Defendants are restrained and enjoined, and
Plaintiff is without adequate remedy at law.
42.
Accordingly, Plaintiff demands an amount of money damages to
compensate the Plaintiff for the harm caused, including but not limited to
Defendant’s profits, statutory and/or punitive damages, as well as equitable
relief, attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest.
18
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF-TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE
19
43.
Plaintiff re-alleges every paragraph in this Complaint.
20
44.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
21
22
Plaintiff had and has valid business relationships and/or business
23
expectancies based on its affiliate relationships; Defendants were and are
24
aware of those relationships and expectancies; Defendants intentionally, with
25
improper purpose and improper means, removed affiliate codes from Plaintiff’s
26
Copyrighted Work and replaced those codes with Defendants’ own affiliate
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 12
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
codes, interfering with those relationships and expectancies and directly and
2
proximately causing damage to Plaintiff thereby, including but limited to loss
3
of revenue, emotional distress.
4
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF-UNJUST ENRICHMENT
5
6
45.
Plaintiff re-alleges every paragraph in this Complaint.
7
46.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
8
9
10
11
Defendants are unjustly enriched Plaintiff’s detriment by taking Plaintiff’s
Copyrighted Work, placing it on Defendants’ website, and changing the
affiliate codes in Plaintiff’s Copyrighted Work to Defendants affiliate codes to
12
divert revenue that Defendants was not entitled to from Plaintiff to
13
Defendants; that these acts are contrary to justice and equity.
14
15
16
17
47.
disgorgement from Defendants, of and for all monies and/or other revenue by
which Defendants were unjustly enriched
DEMAND FOR JUDGMENT & PRAYER FOR RELIEF
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiffs are entitled to an accounting by Defendants, and
WHEREFORE Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants as
follows:
(a)
Granting judgment in favor of Plaintiff against Defendants on all
claims;
(b)
Awarding actual, general and specific, consequential and
25
incidental, damages against Defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount
26
to be determined at trial;
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 13
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
2
3
(c)
Awarding Plaintiff exemplary, statutory, treble damages against
Defendants, jointly and severally;
(d)
Adjudging Defendants liable under United States copyright laws
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
to Plaintiff for statutory, and/or actual damages and disgorgement of
Defendants’ profits, at the election of Plaintiff;
(e)
Enjoining Defendants to account for all gains and advantages
derived from its acts of infringement, misattribution, unfair trade practices,
tortious interference, unjust enrichment, and for its other violations of law,
and in disgorgement, reduce all such gains and advantages to money
judgment in favor of Plaintiff;
(f)
Enjoining Defendants to remove Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Work
from Defendants’ website, such removal to include at a minimum, Defendants’
Links Directory from its website;
(g)
Awarding Plaintiff’s its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs,
including costs for experts, pursuant to State and Federal law;
19
(h)
Awarding Pre- and post- judgment interest; and
20
(i)
Entering such other and further relief as the Court deems
21
22
appropriate under the circumstances.
23
24
25
26
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 14
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
1
2
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury in this action.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DATED __________________
/s/ Steve Burnham
______________________________
STEVE BURNHAM, WSBA 13270
steveb@cdb-law.com
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT &
SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
Tel: (253) 848-3513
Fax: (253) 845-4941
10
/s/ Kurt M. Rylander
11
15
KURT M. RYLANDER, WSBA 27819
rylander@rylanderlaw.com
RYLANDER & ASSOCIATES PC
P.O. Box 250
Vancouver, WA 98666
Tel: (360) 750-9931
Fax: (360) 397-0473
16
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Complaint for Copyright Infringement – Page 15
I:\DATA\D\SAB\HOWELLS, CYNDI\ACOMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.DOCX
CAMPBELL, DILLE, BARNETT
& SMITH, PLLC
317 South Meridian
Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-848-3513
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?