O'Connor v. Behnke et al

Filing 18

ORDER granting 13 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; this matter is DISMISSED for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 GERARD O'CONNOR, CASE NO. C13-5036 RBL 9 Plaintiff, 10 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS v. 11 [Dkt. #13] DONALD BEHNKE, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Bernards and Defendant Trugreen 15 Landcare LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [Dkt. #13]. This 16 personal injury case arises out of two automobile accidents which occurred more than a year 17 apart. Plaintiff O’Connor was involved in each. Defendant Behnke was involved in the first 18 accident, in Washington. Defendant Bernards was involved in the second, which occurred in 19 Oregon. Plaintiff’s complaint invokes this Court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1332 (Diversity 20 of Citizenship). She did not allege federal question jurisdiction, and the subject matter of the 21 lawsuit does not suggest that there is a federal question involved. 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS - 1 1 Plaintiff is a citizen of Washington, as is Behnke. Bernards is a citizen of Oregon, and 2 Trugreen is a Delaware entity with its headquarters in Maryland. Defendants seek dismissal for 3 lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pointing out that there plainly is not complete diversity. 4 Plaintiff’s Response implicitly concedes this point, but asks the Court to deny the Motion 5 because Plaintiff does not have another way to sue all the Defendants in one lawsuit. 6 While that may or may not be true, there is no basis for the Court to “waive” or otherwise 7 alter the requirement of subject matter jurisdiction. The Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #13] is 8 GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED for want of subject matter jurisdiction. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 2nd day of April, 2013. 12 A 13 RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [DKT. #13] - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?