O'Connor v. Behnke et al
Filing
18
ORDER granting 13 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; this matter is DISMISSED for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
1
HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
GERARD O'CONNOR,
CASE NO. C13-5036 RBL
9
Plaintiff,
10
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS
v.
11
[Dkt. #13]
DONALD BEHNKE, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Bernards and Defendant Trugreen
15 Landcare LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [Dkt. #13]. This
16 personal injury case arises out of two automobile accidents which occurred more than a year
17 apart. Plaintiff O’Connor was involved in each. Defendant Behnke was involved in the first
18 accident, in Washington. Defendant Bernards was involved in the second, which occurred in
19 Oregon. Plaintiff’s complaint invokes this Court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1332 (Diversity
20 of Citizenship). She did not allege federal question jurisdiction, and the subject matter of the
21 lawsuit does not suggest that there is a federal question involved.
22
23
24
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS - 1
1
Plaintiff is a citizen of Washington, as is Behnke. Bernards is a citizen of Oregon, and
2 Trugreen is a Delaware entity with its headquarters in Maryland. Defendants seek dismissal for
3 lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pointing out that there plainly is not complete diversity.
4
Plaintiff’s Response implicitly concedes this point, but asks the Court to deny the Motion
5 because Plaintiff does not have another way to sue all the Defendants in one lawsuit.
6
While that may or may not be true, there is no basis for the Court to “waive” or otherwise
7 alter the requirement of subject matter jurisdiction. The Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #13] is
8 GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED for want of subject matter jurisdiction.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 2nd day of April, 2013.
12
A
13
RONALD B. LEIGHTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
[DKT. #13] - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?