Blakeney v. Karr et al

Filing 29

ORDER that the 23 Motion to Amend is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 OLUJIMI AWABH BLAKENEY, No. C13-5076 BHS/KLS 7 8 9 Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION TO AMEND SUSAN KARR, SGT. BRASWELL, C/O LARSON, CRAIG ADAMS, 10 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to amend. ECF No. 23. Plaintiff’s seeks to amend 13 the Statement of Claims portion of his Amended Complaint (ECF No. 8) to state that “Plaintiff 14 claims that defendants acted under color of State law with deliberate indifference to his 15 constitutional right.” Id. Plaintiff previously filed a motion on the same grounds. ECF No. 18. 16 That motion was denied as the proposed amendment is not necessary for a proper adjudication 17 18 of Plaintiff’s claims. ECF No. 22. 19 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 20 1) Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 23) is DENIED as moot. 21 2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. 22 DATED this 3rd day of June, 2013. A 23 24 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?