United States of America v. Haines et al

Filing 87

ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting 82 Motion to Lift Stay; Case reopened. (TG; cc mailed to defendant)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 DANIEL F. HAINES, et al., 12 CASE NO. C13-5082 BHS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO LIFT STAY Defendants. 13 This matter comes before the Court on the Government’s motion to lift stay (Dkt. 14 15 82). 16 On June 3, 2014, the Court stayed this action pending Defendant Daniel Haines’s 17 (“Haines”) bankruptcy proceeding. Dkt. 76. On August 8, 2014, the Government filed 18 the instant motion requesting that the Court lift the stay because Haines’s bankruptcy 19 case was dismissed. Dkt. 82. On August 26, 2014, Haines responded arguing that lifting 20 the stay is not appropriate because he filed a motion for reconsideration of the bankruptcy 21 dismissal and because his time for appeal has not run. Dkt. 84. The bankruptcy court has 22 denied Haines’s motion for reconsideration, and Haines has failed to cite any authority ORDER - 1 1 for the proposition that this action may not proceed despite Haines’s appeal. Moreover, it 2 appears that Haines has failed to timely file an appeal. See Dkt. 85 at 2. Therefore, the 3 Court GRANTS the Government’s motion and the stay is hereby lifted. The Clerk shall 4 reopen this case and renote the Government’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 65) 5 for consideration on the Court’s September 26, 2014 calendar. Pursuant to Local Rule 6 CR 7, Defendants’ response is due no later than September 22, 2014. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated this 3rd day of September, 2014. A 9 10 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?