Lake v. Colvin

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION, re 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 RUCHENE S. LAKE, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 CASE NO. C13-5083 RJB-KLS v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION Defendant. 16 This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation of United States 17 Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom (Dkt. 22). The Magistrate Judge recommends that 18 Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits be reversed and remanded for further 19 administrative proceedings. Dkt. 22. 20 The Court need only make a de novo determination of the portions of Magistrate Judge 21 Strombom’s Report and Recommendation to which Defendant makes objections. 28 U.S.C. § 22 636(b)(1). The parties were to file any objections by March 5, 2014. No objections were filed 23 by that date. 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION- 1 1 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the relevant record, 2 does hereby find and ORDER: 3 (1) The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 22) is ADOPTED. 4 (2) The matter is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for further 5 6 administrative proceedings. The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 7 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 8 Dated this 6th day of March, 2014. A 9 10 ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?