Lake v. Colvin
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION, re 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
11
RUCHENE S. LAKE,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
CASE NO. C13-5083 RJB-KLS
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner
of Social Security,
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION REVERSING
AND REMANDING TO
COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER
CONSIDERATION
Defendant.
16
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation of United States
17
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom (Dkt. 22). The Magistrate Judge recommends that
18
Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits be reversed and remanded for further
19
administrative proceedings. Dkt. 22.
20
The Court need only make a de novo determination of the portions of Magistrate Judge
21
Strombom’s Report and Recommendation to which Defendant makes objections. 28 U.S.C. §
22
636(b)(1). The parties were to file any objections by March 5, 2014. No objections were filed
23
by that date.
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND
REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER FOR
FURTHER CONSIDERATION- 1
1
The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the relevant record,
2 does hereby find and ORDER:
3
(1)
The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 22) is ADOPTED.
4
(2)
The matter is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for further
5
6
administrative proceedings.
The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and
7 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.
8
Dated this 6th day of March, 2014.
A
9
10
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION REVERSING AND
REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER FOR
FURTHER CONSIDERATION- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?