Gibbons v. Ferguson et al
Filing
7
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle denying 5 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 6 Motion to Amend. (TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
TODD ROY GIBBONS,
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION AND
MOTION TO AMEND
v.
BOB FERGUSON,
11
CASE NO. C13-5189 BHS
Defendant.
12
13
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Todd Roy Gibbons’s (“Gibbons”)
14 motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 5) and motion to amend (Dkt. 6)
15
On March 14, 2012, Gibbons filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a
16 proposed complaint. Gibbons alleges that the United States, through the Washington
17 Attorney General and local medical facilities, has caused him to receive an improper
18 medical diagnosis in early 2005. Dkt. 1-1. Gibbons alleges that the improper diagnosis
19 caused the unfavorable decision in his recent claim for social security benefits. Id.
20
On March 20, 2013, the Court denied Gibbons’s motion and dismissed his
21 complaint because of numerous deficiencies in the complaint, including the fundamental
22 jurisdictional deficiencies of failure to exhaust and statute of limitations. Dkt. 4. On
ORDER - 1
1 March 26, 2013, Gibbons filed a motion for reconsideration stating that he failed to
2 include four pages of his complaint (Dkt. 5) and a motion to amend his complaint to add
3 the additional four pages (Dkt. 6).
4
The Court has reviewed the proposed amended complaint (Dkt. 6-1) and Gibbons
5 fails to cure the fundamental jurisdictional deficiencies set forth in the Court’s prior
6 order. Therefore, the Court DENIES Gibbons’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 5) and
7 motion to amend (Dkt. 6).
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated this 27th day of March, 2013.
A
10
11
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?