Ellingburg, Jr. v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER OF REMAND by Judge Karen L Strombom. (TW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 8 9 10 CHARLES ELLINGBURG, JR., 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. Case No. 3:13-CV-05200-KLS 13 ORDER OF REMAND CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned 16 case be reversed and remanded for a de novo hearing and further administrative proceedings, 17 including, but not limited to, the following: the administrative law judge will obtain additional 18 evidence; further evaluate the opinions in the record; determine the residual functional capacity; 19 evaluate the credibility of Plaintiff’s allegations; and determine if Plaintiff can perform his past 20 relevant work. If Plaintiff is unable to perform his past relevant work, the Administrative Law 21 Judge will obtain vocational expert evidence regarding the effect of Plaintiff’s nonexertional 22 limitations on the occupational base. 23 Page 1 ORDER OF REMAND - [3:13-CV-05200-KLS] 1 The parties stipulate that this remand be made pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 2 405(g), and that Plaintiff will be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to the 3 Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon proper request to this Court. 4 DATED this 20th day of August, 2013. 5 6 A 7 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Presented by: s/ Thomas M. Elsberry THOMAS M. ELSBERRY Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Ave., Ste 2900, M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 Telephone: (206) 615-2112 Fax: (206) 615-2531 thomas.elsberry@ssa.gov 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Page 2 ORDER OF REMAND - [3:13-CV-05200-KLS]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?