Cruze v. Warner et al
Filing
39
ORDER denying 29 Motion for Leave signed by Judge J Richard Creatura.(MET) cc: plaintiff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
SCHAWN JAMES CRUZE,
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
BERNIE WARNER, et al.,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND HIS
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
14
15
CASE NO. C13-5220 BHS-JRC
The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action to United States
Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura. The Court’s authority for the referral is 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Magistrate Judge Rules MJR3 and MJR4.
Plaintiff asks the Court to allow him to amend his complaint to show why he names
several supervisory prison officials (ECF No. 29). The Court has reviewed the motion and denies
it because plaintiff is seeking to hold these defendants liable based on the theory of respondeat
superior.
A defendant cannot be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 solely on the basis of a
supervisory responsibility or position. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 436
24
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
AMEND HIS COMPLAINT - 1
1 U.S. 658, 694 n.58 (1978). Thus, the theory of respondeat superior is not sufficient to state a
2 claim under § 1983. Padway v. Palches, 665 F.2d 965, 968 (9th Cir. 1982). Accordingly
3 plaintiff’s proposed amendment to the complaint would be futile and the motion is denied.
4
Dated this 3rd day of July, 2013.
5
6
7
A
J. Richard Creatura
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
AMEND HIS COMPLAINT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?