Capello v. Sziebert et al

Filing 66

ORDER on the 65 Letter by pro se Defendant, Howard Welsh, regarding the rescheduling of his deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff & Mr. Welsh)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 RICARDO CAPELLO, 11 Plaintiff, 13 LESLIE SZIEBERT et al., Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER v. 12 CASE NO. C13-5275 BHS-JRC The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action to United States Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura. The Court’s authority for the referral is 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR3 and MJR4. Pro se defendant, Howard Welsh, has submitted a letter asking the Clerk of Court to order the re-scheduling of his deposition (ECF No. 65). The Court does not conduct business by letter. Any request for Court action must be in the form of a motion properly noted and served on all parties. See, Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1). The Court orders that defendant’s letter will remain in the file, but no action will be taken by the Court. All parties are reminded that the Court requires that the parties meet and confer regarding discovery issues before bringing matters of this nature 24 ORDER - 1 1 before the Court. See, Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(3)(A) and (C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5) 2 (regarding costs to the prevailing party). 3 4 Dated this 18th day of December, 2013. A 5 6 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?