Barton v. Snaza et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time; Amended Complaint or Response due by 7/5/2013, signed by Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: plaintiff

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 J.D. JONES BARTON, 7 Plaintiff, 9 10 11 12 JOHN D. SNAZA, JAMES DOWNING, GEORGE EATON, DEBORAH THOMPSON, VALERIE PETERS, THREASA BECKER, TODD L. THOMA, JON TUNHEIM, SCOTT M. JACKSON, OLIVIA ZHOU, 14 16 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. 13 15 No. C13-5382 BHS/KLS v. 8 By Order dated May 5, 2013, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed or, alternatively to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in the Court’s order. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff was given a deadline to amend or show cause by 17 18 June 28, 2013. Id. On June 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend his deadline until July 5, 19 2013 because he has limited use of the law library. ECF No. 11. Accordingly, it is 20 ORDERED: 21 22 23 (1) must show cause or file his amended complaint on or before July 5, 2013, or the Court will recommend dismissal of this action. 24 // 25 26 Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED. Plaintiff // ORDER - 1 1 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. 2 3 DATED this 19th day of June, 2013. 4 A 5 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?