Bell v. United States of America

Filing 5

ORDER re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Raymond Leo Jarlik Bell; this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in this Order. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 9/13/2013 (DN). (cc to petitioner)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 RAYMOND LEO JARLIK BELL, CASE NO. C13-5609 RBL 9 Petitioner, 10 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Respondent. 13 14 THIS MATTER is before the court on its own Motion. Petitioner Raymond Leo Jarlick 15 Bell has filed a petition for writ habeas corpus, purportedly under 28 U.S.C. §2241 [Dkt. #1]. 16 The Petition lists a variety of bases, all of which could be appealed, and which presumably are 17 the subject of the Petitioner’s current appeal of his conviction and sentence. [See Dkt. # 268] 18 The Petition claims primarily that Petitioner is “actually innocent.” His Petition is 19 properly characterized as a §2255 petition. 20 Absent extraordinary circumstances not present here, this Court should not consider a 21 collateral attack on a judgment while a direct appeal is pending. See Feldman v. Henman, 815 22 F.2d 1318, 1320 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied 503 U.S. 795 (1992); United States v. Pirro, 104 23 F.3d 297 299 (9th Cir. 1997). 24 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE - 1 1 The Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Petitioner may re-file, if 2 necessary, after the conclusion of his direct appeal. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated this 13th day of September, 2013. 6 A 7 RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?