Colwell v. Colvin

Filing 28

ORDER granting 26 Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) by Judge J Richard Creatura.(SH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 RICHARD E. COLWELL, 11 12 Plaintiff, v. 14 CAROLYN W COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 15 CASE NO. 13-cv-05913 JRC ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) Defendant. 13 16 This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and Local 17 Magistrate Judge Rule MJR 13 (see also Notice of Initial Assignment to a U.S. Magistrate Judge 18 and Consent Form, Dkt. 6; Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge, Dkt. 7). 19 This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 20 406(b) (see Dkt. 26). Defendant has no objection to plaintiff’s request (see Dkt. 27). 21 The Court may allow a reasonable fee for an attorney who represented a Social Security 22 Title II claimant before the Court and obtained a favorable judgment, as long as such fee is not in 23 excess of 25 percent of the total of past-due benefits. See 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1); Grisbrecht v. 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(B) - 1 1 Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002). When a contingency agreement applies, the Court will look first 2 to such agreement and will conduct an independent review to assure the reasonableness of the 3 fee requested, taking into consideration the character of the representation and results achieved. 4 See Grisbrecht, supra, 535 U.S. at 807, 808 (footnote omitted) (citations omitted). Although the 5 fee agreement is the primary means for determining the fee, the Court will adjust the fee 6 downward if substandard representation was provided, if the attorney caused excessive delay, or 7 if a windfall would result from the requested fee. See Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1151 8 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Grisbrecht, supra, 535 U.S. at 808). 9 Here, the representation was standard, at least, and the results achieved excellent (see 10 Dkt. 26 Attachments 3, 8). See Grisbrecht, supra, 535 U.S. at 808. Following this Court’s 11 remand (Dkt. 20) and a second hearing, the ALJ awarded benefits to plaintiff (Dkt. 26, 12 Attachment 1, p. 1). There has not been excessive delay and no windfall will result from the 13 requested fee. 14 Plaintiff’s total back payment for Title II benefits was $44,322.00 (through July, 2016) 15 and for Title XVI benefits was $2,246.70 (February to June, 2011) for a total of $46,568.70 (see 16 id., Attachments 1, 3, 8). Plaintiff has moved for a net attorney’s fee of $4,308.04 (see Motion, 17 Dkt. 26, p. 1), and the Court has considered plaintiff’s gross attorney’s fee of $11,642.17; and the 18 EAJA award received by plaintiff’s attorney in the amount of $7,334.13 ($8,139.62 minus 19 $24.49 expenses and the $781.00 offset to that EAJA award that was seized pursuant to the 20 Department of the Treasury’s Offset program) (see Dkt. 25; Dkt. 26, Attachment 7). See 31 21 U.S.C. §§ 3711(a), 3716(a); Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S.C. 586, 589, 593, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2524, 22 2527 (2010); Parish v. Comm’r. Soc. Sec. Admin., 698 F.3d 1215, 1221 (9th Cir. 2012). 23 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(B) - 2 1 Based on plaintiff’s motion and supporting documents (see Dkt. 26, Attachments 1, 2, 3, 2 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), and with no objection from defendant (Dkt. 27), it is hereby ORDERED that 3 attorney’s fees in the gross amount of $11,642.17 be awarded to plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to 4 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), thus, after the subtraction of previously received EAJA fees ($7,334.13), 5 leaving net attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,308.04 remaining to be awarded to plaintiff’s 6 attorney pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). After the $4,308.04 in fees are paid to plaintiff’s 7 attorney based on this Order, the balance of withheld funds should be released to plaintiff. 8 Dated this 4th day of January, 2017. A 9 10 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(B) - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?