Leckron v. Colvin

Filing 31

ORDER by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour granting Plaintiff's 29 motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (PM)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 JILL LECKRON, 10 CASE NO. C13-5931-JCC Plaintiff, 11 ORDER v. 12 13 14 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Jill Leckron’s unopposed motion for 17 attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Dkt. No. 29). Under § 406(b)(1), 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits. Leckron agreed to pay Counsel 25% of her past-due benefits if her Social Security appeal was successful. (Dkt. No. 29-2 at 2.) Leckron received $89,606.00 in past-due benefits. (Dkt. No. 293 at 2.) Accordingly, Leckron asks this Court to authorize an attorney fee of $16,401.50.1 (Dkt. No. 29 at 1.) 25 26 1 ORDER PAGE - 1 This amount takes into account a recently-allowed agency fee of $6,000. (Dkt. No. 29 at 1.) 1 The Commissioner does not oppose the request or the amount of fees. (See Dkt. No. 30 at 2 1.) The motion for attorney fees (Dkt. No. 29) is GRANTED. The Court authorizes attorney fees 3 in the amount of $16,401.50 in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Counsel is directed to 4 refund Leckron $7,809.14, the amount in attorney fees paid to Counsel under the Equal Access 5 to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (See Dkt. No. 29 at 1.) 6 DATED this 23rd day of January 2017. 7 8 9 A 10 11 12 John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?