Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Martin et al

Filing 2

ORDER to Remand Case by Judge Benjamin H Settle. (TG; cc mailed to defendants)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 MICHAEL D. MARTIN, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 CASE NO. C13-5720 BHS ORDER REMANDING CASE 14 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ notice of removal and related 15 documents. Dkt. 1. 16 On October 14, 2013, Plaintiff filed an unlawful detainer action in Clark County 17 Superior Court for the State of Washington. Id. On December 3, 2013, Defendants 18 removed the action to this Court. Id. 19 The notice of removal of a civil action or proceeding shall be filed within 30 days 20 after the receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial 21 pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding is based, 22 ORDER - 1 1 or within 30 days after the service of summons upon the defendant if such initial pleading 2 has then been filed in court and is not required to be served on the defendant, whichever 3 period is shorter. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1). Moreover, if at any time before final judgment 4 it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be 5 remanded. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). 6 In this case, Defendants’ removal is deficient because the Court lacks subject 7 matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s action. An unlawful detainer action is a state law 8 action for possession of real property. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, 9 and such an action to obtain possession of real property does not create jurisdiction in this 10 court. Therefore, the Court sua sponte REMANDS the matter to Clark County Superior 11 Court. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated this 4th day of December, 2013. A 14 15 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?