Hahn v. Waddington et al
Filing
72
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 64 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa L Fricke. Plaintiff's Deadline for submitting Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is 1/19/2018. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Aaron Hahn, Prisoner ID: 332715)(GMR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
4
5
6
AARON HAHN,
Case No. 3:14-cv-05047-RJB-TLF
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
v.
DOUG WADDINGTON, et al,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants.
11
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s filing of a motion for leave to file an
12
amended complaint. Dkt. 64. In his motion, plaintiff states that since the filing of his original
13
complaint, he has discovered evidence that will further substantiate his claims and would like to
14
add that evidence to his case. Id.
15
As defendants point out in their opposition to the motion, plaintiff has not attached a copy
16
of his proposed amended complaint as required by Local Rule LCR 15. For this reason, the Court
17
is denying plaintiff’s motion, but will give plaintiff to re-file his motion in accordance with LCR
18
15. Plaintiff should be aware that should he choose to re-file, in addition to “attach[ing] a copy of
19
the proposed amended pleading as an exhibit to” the motion, he “must indicate on the proposed
20
amended [complaint] how it differs from [his original complaint] by bracketing or striking
21
through the text to be deleted and underlining or highlighting the text to be added.” Id. Further,
22
“[t]he proposed amended pleading must not incorporate by reference any part of the preceding
23
pleading, including exhibits.” Id.
24
25
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT - 1
1
Accordingly, if plaintiff still wishes to amend his original complaint he must by no later
2
than January 19, 2018, (1) file a motion for leave to amend his original complaint, (2) attach a
3
copy of his proposed amended complaint, indicating on the proposed amended complaint how it
4
differs from the original complaint by bracketing or striking through the text to be deleted and
5
underlining or highlighting the text to be added, and (3) not incorporate by reference any part of
6
his original complaint, including exhibits attached to the original complaint.
7
Dated this 21st day of December, 2017.
8
9
A
10
11
Theresa L. Fricke
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?