Wallmuller v. Russell et al

Filing 31

ORDER finding as moot 16 Motion to Waive Filing Fee signed by Judge J Richard Creatura.(MET) cc: plaintiff

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 FRANK A. WALLMULLER, 11 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 12 CASE NO. C14-5121 RBL-JRC SCOTT RUSSELL, DEBORAH WOFFORD, and PATRICIA FLORES, 14 Defendants. 15 16 This 42 U.S.C. §1983 civil rights matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate 17 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636 (b) (1) (A) and (B) and Local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR 18 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. 19 Plaintiff asks the Court to waive the filing fee in this case so that defendants can be 20 served at the expense of the Court (Dkt. 16). The Court denies plaintiff’s motion because 21 defendants have waived service of process and this issue is moot. 22 Defendants removed this matter from state court, but defendants originally indicated that 23 they may be contesting the sufficiency of service of process (Dkt. 1, p. 1). The Court ordered 24 plaintiff to apply for in forma pauperis status if he wanted the Court to serve the matter for him ORDER - 1 1 (Dkt. 4). Defendants answered the complaint and again stated that they did not waive service of 2 process (Dkt. 5, p. 1). Approximately one month later, defendants informed the Court that they 3 waived formal service of process (Dkt. 15). 4 Plaintiff’s motion to waive filing fees (Dkt. 16) is moot. The filing fee was paid by 5 defendants when they removed the action from state court. Plaintiff does not need in forma 6 pauperis status for service of process as service had been formally waived (Dkt. 15). The Court 7 denies plaintiff’s motion. 8 The Clerk’s Office is instructed to remove Dkt. 16 from the Court’s calendar. 9 Dated this 15th day of April, 2014. A 10 11 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?