Mills v. Bank of America NA et al

Filing 29

ORDER granting 17 Defendant Bishop, White, Marshall & Weibel's Motion for Summary Judgment, dismissing all claims against Defendant BWMW with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)

1

JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

7
8
9

SCOTT C. MILLS,
NO. 3:14-cv-05238-RBL

10

Plaintiffs,
v.

11
12
13
14

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ITS
SUCCESSORS AND AFFILIATES;
TRUSTEE BISHOP, WHITE, MARSHALL
AND WEIBEL, P.S.; and BLACK
CORPORATIONS,

15
16
17

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
BISHOP, WHITE, MARSHALL &
WEIBEL’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants.
THIS MATTER came for hearing upon the Defendant Bishop, White, Marshall & Weibel,
P.S.’s (“BWMW”) Motion for Summary Judgment, and the court having considered the records

18

and files herein, and the following additional pleadings and evidence:
19

1.

Defendant BWMW’s Motion for Summary Judgment;

2.

Declaration of Melanie Sattler in support of Defendant BWMW’s Motion for

20
21
22

Summary Judgment, and Exhibits thereto;

23

3.

Response from Plaintiff; if any;

24

4.

Response from Defendant Bank of America, N.A., if any;

25

5.

Reply of Defendant BWMW’s to Plaintiffs’ Response.

ORDER GRANTING BWMW’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 1
3:14-cv-05238-RBL

1
2
3
4

Now therefore, BASED UPON the evidence presented, the Court finds that Defendant
BWMW is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
BASED UPON the above finding, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
DECREED that:

5

1.

Defendant BWMW’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

2.

Summary Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant BWMW and all claims

6
7

asserted in Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendant BWMW are hereby DISMISSED with
8
9
10

prejudice.
Dated this 23rd day of July, 2014.

11
12
13
14

A
RONALD B. LEIGHTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

ORDER GRANTING BWMW’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 2
3:14-cv-05238-RBL