Amaral v. Colvin

Filing 19

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on the 18 MOTION to Remand Stipulated filed by Carolyn W Colvin. Noting Date 8/11/2014, signed by Judge Karen L Strombom. (MET)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 3 4 5 LARRY AMARAL, 6 7 8 9 Case No. 14-5261 RBL-KLS Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. CAROLINE W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 10 Defendant. 11 12 This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 13 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule MJR 4(a)(4) and as authorized by Mathews, Secretary of H.E.W. 14 15 v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976). This matter is before the Court on the stipulated motion for 16 remand . (ECF 18). After reviewing the parties’ stipulated motion and the remaining record, the 17 undersigned recommends that the Court grant the parties’ motion, and remand this matter to the 18 Commissioner for further proceedings. 19 20 This court recommends that on remand, the ALJ will be directed to reevaluate the source opinions of record, including the opinion of Tasmyn Bowes, Psy.D., and give reasons for the 21 22 23 24 25 26 weight given; reassess Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity; further evaluate whether Plaintiff can perform his past relevant work; and, if warranted, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert. This Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 1 Given the fact of the parties’ stipulation, the Court recommends that the District Judge 2 immediately approve this Report and Recommendation and order the case REVERSED and 3 REMANDED. A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation. 4 DATED this 11th day of August, 2014. 5 A 6 7 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?