Reesman v. Obenland

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 21 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Joel Paul Reesman; Petitioner had paid the full filing fee; in forma pauperis status denied as moot; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 11/4/2014 (DN). (cc to pltf)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

4
5
6

JOEL PAUL REESMAN,

7
8
9

Petitioner,

No. C14-5271 RBL/KLS

v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION

MIKE OBENLAND,

10

Respondent.

11
12

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen

13

L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record,

14

does hereby find and ORDER:

15
16

(1)

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2)

Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot because
petitioner has paid the full filing fee.

(3)

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the Hon.

17
18
19
20

Karen L. Strombom.
DATED this 4th day of November, 2014.

21
22
23
24

A
RONALD B. LEIGHTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1