Reesman v. Obenland
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Karen L Strombom re 31 Letter. (MET) cc: petitioner
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
9
JOEL PAUL REESMAN,
NO. C14-5271 RBL/KLS
Petitioner,
10
11
12
ORDER
v.
MIKE OBENLAND,
Respondent.
13
14
By Order dated November 5, 2014, this habeas proceeding was stayed pending
15
resolution of Petitioner’s state court proceedings. Dkt. 28. On April 7, 2015 Petitioner filed a
16
motion asking for permission to file his additional grounds for relief and supplemental briefing
17
regarding his now exhausted claims. Dkt. 30. That motion is noted for consideration on April
18
24, 2015.
19
On April 14, 2015, the Clerk’s office received and filed a letter from petitioner
20
21
addressed to the Clerk of Court. Petitioner’s letter addresses mistakes in his April 7, 2015
22
filings including failure to provide proof of service and failure to serve a letter, that
23
accompanied the motion, on the Attorney General’s Office. See Dkt. 31. Petitioner asks how
24
he can get a copy of his previous letter to Respondent’s counsel and also states that he did
25
serve his motion to file supplemental briefing on Respondent’s counsel. Id.
26
ORDER -1
1
2
3
Petitioner’s prior letter is attached to the motion that is noted for consideration on April
24, 2015. See Dkt. 30. Thus, Respondent’s counsel has access to petitioner’s letter.
The Court does not conduct business by letter. Letters are not noted on the motion
4
docket and may not come to the undersigned judge’s attention. Any future request for Court
5
6
7
action must be in the form of a motion that is properly filed, noted, and served on opposing
counsel. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.
8
9
DATED this 16th day of April, 2015.
11
A
12
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER -2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?