Plechner v. State of Washington

Filing 23

ORDER denying 20 Motion for Reconsideration re 17 Order on Motion to Stay and for Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Petitioner)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 RICHARD PLECHNER, Petitioner, 11 12 13 14 15 16 CASE NO. C14-5321 RBL-KLS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. DONALD R. HOLBROOK, Respondent. Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration of this Court’s Order dated June 19, 2014 (Dkt. 17). Dkt. 20. In the Court’s June 19, 2014 Order, it granted 17 Petitioner’s motion to stay this matter pending resolution of his state court proceedings. 18 The Court also denied Petitioner’s motion for counsel. Dkt. 17. Petitioner contends that, 19 20 21 22 contrary to the Court’s Order, he did explain why he needed counsel and asks that this should be considered. Dkt. 20. Under Local Rule CR7(h), motions for reconsideration are disfavored and will be 23 denied absent a showing of manifest error or a showing of new facts or legal authority 24 which could not have been presented earlier with reasonable diligence. The standard has ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION- 1 1 not been met in this case. In addition, all proceedings in this matter have been stayed at 2 Petitioner’s request. After the state court proceedings have ended and the stay in this 3 matter is lifted, Respondent shall file his answer to the petition. At that time, the Court 4 5 can determine whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. Until that time, there is no need for counsel. 6 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 7 (1) Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 20) is DENIED. (2) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to Petitioner and counsel for 8 9 10 11 Respondent. DATED this 18th day of July, 2014. A 12 13 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 14 . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?