Embry v. Sinclair
Filing
42
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION AND ANSWER BY RESPONDENT by Judge Theresa L Fricke. Petitioner shall file his amended petition on or before May 24, 2019. Whether or not petitioner files his amended petition, the stay of procee dings is hereby lifted. If petitioner files an amended petition on or before May 24, 2019, respondent shall file his answer 45 days after the filing of the amended petition. If petitioner fails to file an amended petition on or before May 24, 2019, respondent shall file his answer to the original petition by July 8, 2019. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Randall Embry, Prisoner ID: 794030)(GMR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
4
5
6
RANDALL MARQUISE EMBRY,
Case No. C14-5360-BHS-TLF
7
8
9
10
Petitioner,
v.
STEPHEN SINCLAIR,
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER
TO FILE AMENDED PETITION
AND ANSWER BY RESPONDENT
Respondent.
11
Petitioner Randall Marquise Embry filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his custody
12
under a state court judgment and sentence. Dkt. 9. On July 7, 2014, the Court granted petitioner’s
13
request for a stay, Dkt. 19, and extended the stay on July 21, 2016, but required status reports
14
every 90 days. Dkt. 24. On August 8, 2018, after petitioner failed to file a status report and did
15
not respond to an order that he do so, the Court issued an Order directing petitioner to show
16
cause why the stay should not be lifted. Dkt. 36. Petitioner responded, asserting that he did not
17
receive the prior orders, and requesting until December 24, 2018 to file an amended petition.
18
Dkt. 37. The Court granted petitioner’s request. Dkt. 38.
19
On January 5, 2019, petitioner filed a request for an extension of time to file his amended
20
habeas petition noting that the prison library had been closed. Dkt. 39. The Court granted
21
petitioner’s request for extension and directed him to file his amended petition on or before
22
March 31, 2019. Dkt. 41. To date petitioner has not filed an amended petition nor has he
23
requested an extension of time to do so.
24
25
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED
PETITION AND ANSWER BY RESPONDENT - 1
1
Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED:
2
(1) Petitioner shall file his amended petition on or before May 24, 2019. Whether or not
3
petitioner files his amended petition, the stay of proceedings is hereby lifted.
4
5
6
7
(2) If petitioner files an amended petition on or before May 24, 2019, respondent shall file
his answer 45 days after the filing of the amended petition.
(3) If petitioner fails to file an amended petition on or before May 24, 2019, respondent shall
file his answer to the original petition by July 8, 2019.
8
(4) As part of such answer, respondent shall state whether petitioner has exhausted available
9
state remedies and whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. Respondent shall not file
10
a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing cause as to why an
11
answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the Clerk of the Court and
12
serve a copy of the answer on petitioner.
13
(5) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule LCR 7. Accordingly, on the
14
face of the answer, respondent shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after
15
filing. Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately
16
preceding the Friday designated for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file
17
and serve a reply not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter.
18
(6) The Clerk shall provide copies of this order to petitioner and counsel for respondent.
19
Dated this 2nd day of May, 2019.
20
21
22
A
23
Theresa L. Fricke
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED
PETITION AND ANSWER BY RESPONDENT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?