Embry v. Sinclair

Filing 42

ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION AND ANSWER BY RESPONDENT by Judge Theresa L Fricke. Petitioner shall file his amended petition on or before May 24, 2019. Whether or not petitioner files his amended petition, the stay of procee dings is hereby lifted. If petitioner files an amended petition on or before May 24, 2019, respondent shall file his answer 45 days after the filing of the amended petition. If petitioner fails to file an amended petition on or before May 24, 2019, respondent shall file his answer to the original petition by July 8, 2019. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Randall Embry, Prisoner ID: 794030)(GMR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 RANDALL MARQUISE EMBRY, Case No. C14-5360-BHS-TLF 7 8 9 10 Petitioner, v. STEPHEN SINCLAIR, ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION AND ANSWER BY RESPONDENT Respondent. 11 Petitioner Randall Marquise Embry filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his custody 12 under a state court judgment and sentence. Dkt. 9. On July 7, 2014, the Court granted petitioner’s 13 request for a stay, Dkt. 19, and extended the stay on July 21, 2016, but required status reports 14 every 90 days. Dkt. 24. On August 8, 2018, after petitioner failed to file a status report and did 15 not respond to an order that he do so, the Court issued an Order directing petitioner to show 16 cause why the stay should not be lifted. Dkt. 36. Petitioner responded, asserting that he did not 17 receive the prior orders, and requesting until December 24, 2018 to file an amended petition. 18 Dkt. 37. The Court granted petitioner’s request. Dkt. 38. 19 On January 5, 2019, petitioner filed a request for an extension of time to file his amended 20 habeas petition noting that the prison library had been closed. Dkt. 39. The Court granted 21 petitioner’s request for extension and directed him to file his amended petition on or before 22 March 31, 2019. Dkt. 41. To date petitioner has not filed an amended petition nor has he 23 requested an extension of time to do so. 24 25 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION AND ANSWER BY RESPONDENT - 1 1 Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: 2 (1) Petitioner shall file his amended petition on or before May 24, 2019. Whether or not 3 petitioner files his amended petition, the stay of proceedings is hereby lifted. 4 5 6 7 (2) If petitioner files an amended petition on or before May 24, 2019, respondent shall file his answer 45 days after the filing of the amended petition. (3) If petitioner fails to file an amended petition on or before May 24, 2019, respondent shall file his answer to the original petition by July 8, 2019. 8 (4) As part of such answer, respondent shall state whether petitioner has exhausted available 9 state remedies and whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. Respondent shall not file 10 a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing cause as to why an 11 answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the Clerk of the Court and 12 serve a copy of the answer on petitioner. 13 (5) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule LCR 7. Accordingly, on the 14 face of the answer, respondent shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after 15 filing. Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately 16 preceding the Friday designated for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file 17 and serve a reply not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. 18 (6) The Clerk shall provide copies of this order to petitioner and counsel for respondent. 19 Dated this 2nd day of May, 2019. 20 21 22 A 23 Theresa L. Fricke United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION AND ANSWER BY RESPONDENT - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?