Brown v. Colvin
Filing
27
ORDER AFFIRMING DEFENDANT'S DECISION TO DENY BENEFITS, 23 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Billy Wayne Brown. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
4
5
6
BILLY WAYNE BROWN,
Case No. 3:14-cv-05447-RJB-KLS
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AFFIRMING DEFENDANT’S
DECISION TO DENY BENEFITS
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
10
Defendant.
11
12
13
14
15
16
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Judge Karen
L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 23. The Court has considered plaintiff's
complaint (Dkt. 3), the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 23), objections to the Report and
Recommendation and related responsive briefing (Dkt. 23; Dkt. 25), and the file therein.
17
18
19
Having reviewed the record, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, which
affirms Defendant’s denial of Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance and supplemental
20
security income (“SSI”) benefits. See Dkt. 23. The Court also finds Plaintiff’s objections to the
21
Report and Recommendation to be unpersuasive. First, Plaintiff objects on the basis that the ALJ
22
did not provide legally sufficient reasons to reject Plaintiff’s expert witness, Dr. Christmas
23
Covell. Dkt. 23, at 1-4. However, as the Report and Recommendation points out, although “the
24
ALJ did not incorporate Dr. Covell’s opinion word-for-word, the ALJ did not improperly
25
26
characterize the functional limitations opined by Dr. Covell,” Dkt. 21, at 9, because the ALJ need
not “repea[t] each functional limitation verbatim in the RFC assessment” but may instead
ORDER - 1
1
“synthesize and translate assessed limitations.” Quill v. Colvin, 2014 WL 3608894 (E.D. Wash.
2
2014) (citing Stubbs-Danielson v. Astrue, 539 F.3d 1219, 1228 (9th Cir. 2008). Second, Plaintiff
3
objects that the ALJ did not provide legally sufficient reasons to discredit Plaintiff’s subjective
4
testimony. Dkt. 23, at 4-7. Plaintiff is mistaken. The ALJ’s opinion shows clear and convincing
5
reasons to reject Plaintiff’s testimony, including the ALJ’s finding that (1) Plaintiff’s allegations
6
7
were not supported by the objective medical evidence; (2) Plaintiff’s allegations were not
8
supported by his own statements; and (3) Plaintiff’s own statements were contradictory. ALJ AR
9
41-45.
10
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:
11
(1)
the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 23); and
(2)
the administrative decision is AFFIRMED.
12
13
14
(3) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to all parties and to Magistrate Judge
Strombom.
15
16
DATED this 10th day of April, 2015.
A
17
18
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?