Kauffman v. Anchor Bank

Filing 25

ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES, granting 24 Motion for Extension of Time. The Clerk of the Court should set deadlines in this case using a September 28, 2015 trial date. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 FRANCINE KAUFFMAN, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES v. ANCHOR BANK, Defendant. 15 16 CASE NO. 14-5510 RJB This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion to Extend 17 Deadlines. Dkt. 24. The Court has reviewed the pleadings filed regarding the motion, and the 18 remaining record. 19 Plaintiff, pro se, filed this case on June 27, 2014. Dkt. 1. The case arises from a 20 construction loan on property located in Ocean Shores, Washington. Dkt. 1. Her motion for 21 emergency injunctive relief barring Defendant from foreclosing on the property was denied. Dkt. 22 6. Plaintiff’s motion for application for entry of default was denied on July 30, 2014 (Dkt. 10) 23 and her motion for reconsideration of that motion was denied on August 7, 2014 (Dkt. 18) after 24 Defendant appeared. ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES- 1 1 Plaintiff now moves, unopposed, for an extension of the case deadlines of sixty to ninety 2 days due to heart surgery. Dkt. 24. 3 Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. 24) should be granted. The Clerk of the Court should set 4 deadlines in this case using a September 28, 2015 trial date. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 7 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 8 9 10 11 Dated this 16th day of March, 2015. A ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?