Troupe v. Kapa et al

Filing 60

ORDER that the undersigned DECLINES to recuse voluntarily. Plaintiff's 58 MOTION for Recusal of the undersigned is REFERRED to Chief Judge Marsha J. Pechman for decision and the Clerk of the Court is directed to place the moti on for the recusal of the undersigned on Judge Pechman's motion calendar.This action and all motions currently pending before the Court are hereby STAYED pending resolution of the recusal issue. No further motions shall be filed in this matter until the stay is lifted. Any motion filed while the matter is stayed shall not be considered and shall be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG)**3 PAGES, PRINT ALL**

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

7
8

DAVID TROUPE,

9
No. C14-5529 RBL-KLS

Plaintiff,
10
11
12

v.
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO RECUSE

ADAM KAPA, et al.,
Defendants.

13
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Recuse. Dkt. 58. Plaintiff contends, inter alia,
14
15

that the undersigned shows favoritism to defendants’ counsel, cannot be trusted to rule on

16

dispositive motions, and has exceeded her authority. Plaintiff also states that he is filing a

17

judicial misconduct complaint against the undersigned in the Ninth Circuit. Id. Plaintiff’s

18

primary complaints arise from the undersigned’s order denying his second motion for extension

19
20

of the Court’s pretrial deadlines and third motion to compel. See Dkt. 56.
DISCUSSION

21
22
23

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), a judge of the United States shall disqualify herself in any
proceeding in which her impartiality “might reasonably be questioned.” A federal judge also

24

shall disqualify herself in circumstances where she has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a

25

party or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding. 28 U.S.C.

26

§ 455(b)(1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144:
ORDER REGARDING RECUSAL MOTION - 1

Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely
and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a
personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such
judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear
such proceeding.

1
2
3
4

Under both 28 U.S.C. §144 and 28 U.S.C. § 455, recusal of a federal judge is appropriate

5
if “a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts would conclude that the judge’s
6
7

impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Yagman v. Republic Insurance, 987 F.2d 622, 626

8

(9th Cir.1993). This is an objective inquiry concerned with whether there is the appearance of

9

bias, not whether there is bias in fact. Preston v. United States, 923 F.2d 731, 734 (9th

10

Cir.1992); United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.1980). In Liteky v. United

11

States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994), the United States Supreme Court further explained the narrow basis

12

for recusal:

13
[J]udicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality
motion. . . . [O]pinions formed by the judge on the basis of facts introduced or
events occurring in the course of the current proceedings, or of prior proceedings,
do not constitute a basis for a bias or partiality motion unless they display a deep
seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible. Thus,
judicial remarks during the course of a trial that are critical or disapproving of, or
even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias
or partiality challenge.

14
15
16
17
18
19

Id. at 555.
This Court makes rulings in each case based upon the issues presented by the parties or

20
21

upon sua sponte review by the Court. The undersigned has no personal bias or reason to be

22

partial to one side or the other in this matter. The undersigned finds no reason to recuse herself

23
24

voluntarily from this case, and declines to do so.
//

25
26

//

ORDER REGARDING RECUSAL MOTION - 2

CONCLUSION

1
2
3
4

There is no reasonable basis for a voluntary recusal in this instance. However, Plaintiff’s
motion shall be referred to the Chief Judge for a determination of its merits. Local Rules W.D.
Wash. 3(e).

5
Accordingly it is hereby ORDERED that the undersigned DECLINES to recuse
6
7

voluntarily. Plaintiff’s motion for recusal of the undersigned is REFERRED to Chief Judge

8

Marsha J. Pechman for decision and the Clerk of the Court is directed to place the motion for the

9

recusal of the undersigned on Judge Pechman’s motion calendar.

10
11
12

This action and all motions currently pending before the Court are hereby STAYED
pending resolution of the recusal issue. No further motions shall be filed in this matter until the
stay is lifted. Any motion filed while the matter is stayed shall not be considered and shall be

13
dismissed.
14
15
16

The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for
Respondent.

17
DATED this 16th day of July, 2015.
18
19
20
21

A
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
ORDER REGARDING RECUSAL MOTION - 3