Garnica v. State of Washington et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Extension of Time; Plaintiff response to Defendants' 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment is due by 2/27/15. Defendants' reply must be filed by 3/6/15. The Clerk's office is instructed to re-note defendants' 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment for 3/6/15. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
MARCO GARNICA,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. C14-5546 BHS-JRC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
BERNARD WARNER, RONALD
FRAKER, D. KUTH,
15
Defendants.
16
17
The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action to United States
18 Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and local
19 Magistrate Judge Rules MJR1, MJR3 and MJR4.
20
Plaintiff asks the Court for an additional thirty days to file a response to defendants’
21 motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 20). Defendants do not oppose the motion. Instead,
22 defendants ask the Court to give plaintiff forty-five additional days because defense counsel will
23 be out of state when the response would be due (Dkt. 21). Because the motion is unopposed, the
24 Court does not need to wait for the January 16, 2015 noting date to hear this motion.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL
TIME TO RESPOND - 1
1
The Court grants plaintiff an additional forty-five days, until February 27, 2015, to file a
2 response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ reply must be filed by
3 March 6, 2015. The Clerk’s office is instructed to re-note defendants’ motion for summary
4 judgment (Dkt. 15) for March 6, 2015.
5
Dated this 8th day of January, 2015.
A
6
7
J. Richard Creatura
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL
TIME TO RESPOND - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?