Williams v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Motion to Remand signed by Judge Karen L Strombom. This matter is REVERSED and REMANDED. (MET)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 8 9 10 KEVIN JAMAL WILLIAMS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. Civil No. 3:14-CV-05571-KLS 13 ORDER ON REMAND CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision in regard to Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge shall further develop the record and the claimant shall have an opportunity to present additional evidence. That Administrative Law Judge shall evaluate Dr. Bristol-Swanson’s opinion that the claimant is limited to sedentary work and needs to work with his back to the wall with the ability to see the entire room. The ALJ shall also reassess the 23 24 Page 1 ORDER - [3:14-CV-05571-KLS] 1 residual functional capacity and provide rationale for the assessed limitations; and obtain 2 supplemental vocational expert evidence at step five. 3 DATED this 24th day of November, 2014. 4 A 5 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Presented by: s/ Benjamin J. Groebner BENJAMIN J. GROEBNER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 Telephone: (206) 615-2494 Fax: (206) 615-2531 benjamin.groebner@ssa.gov 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Page 2 ORDER - [3:14-CV-05571-KLS]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?