Lee v. Norris et al

Filing 42

ORDER re 39 Motion for Clarification - Motions in Limine by Judge David W. Christel.(KEB)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

8
9
10

CHONG KOO LEE,

11

Plaintiff,

13

ORDER

v.

12

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05595-DWC

BOB E. NORRIS, WR BENGER
TRANSPORT, LLC,

14
Defendants.
15
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and Local Rule
17
MJR 13, the parties have consented to have this matter heard by the undersigned Magistrate
18
Judge. See Dkt. 32. Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification.
19
Dkt. 39.
20
Plaintiff moves for clarification of the Court’s Order granting Defendants’ Motion in
21
Limine requesting the Court ban any reference to the parties’ financial status. See Dkt. 18, p. 2;
22
28. The Court clarifies the Order on Defendants’ Motions in Limine as follows:
23
24

ORDER - 1

1

The motion to ban any reference to the parties’ financial status is granted, provided

2 Plaintiff is allowed to present testimony concerning economic damages which may include
3 testimony as to his lost wages.
4

Dated this 26th day of April, 2016.

A

5
6

David W. Christel
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

ORDER - 2