Hankerson v. Sinclair

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 26 dismissing the petition; 27 Denying Petitioner's Motion for Property; and 28 denying Petitioner's Motion for Stay; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 3/23/2015 (DN). (cc to pltf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 CULLEN M. HANKERSON, 8 Petitioner, 9 10 v. STEVE SINCLAIR, 11 Respondent. 12 CASE NO. C14-5623 RBL-JRC ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PROPERTY AND STAY [Dkt. #s 26, 27, and 28] 13 14 The Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Hon. J. Richard 15 Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge does hereby Order: 16 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; (2) The Court dismisses the petition for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Two of petitioner’s grounds for relief are procedurally defaulted and the remaining claims challenge conditions of confinement and not his guilty plea or sentence. (3) No certificate of appealability will be issued 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff Hankerson’s Motion for an Order Compelling Defendants to send his property to his current location is DENIED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Stay is DENIED. 23 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 1 The matter is DISMISSED. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED this 23rd day of March, 2015. 6 7 A 8 RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [DKT. #S 26, 27, AND 28] - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?