Cosden v. State of Washington

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Motion for More Definite Statement and orders petitioner to submit a new petition using hte form provided by the Court. Petitioner's first amended petition must be filed on or before March 6, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Petitioner w/blank petition)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 10 11 WILLIAM E COSDEN, 12 Petitioner, 13 CASE NO. C14-5739 BHS-JRC ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT v. 14 JEFF UTTECHT, 15 Respondent. 16 The District Court referred this petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 17 18 U.S.C. § 2254 to United States Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura. The referral is made 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR3 and 20 MJR4. 21 Currently before the Court is respondent’s motion asking the Court to order petitioner to 22 submit a more definite statement (Dkt. 21). Respondent argues that it is unclear if petitioner is 23 challenging his 1976 rape conviction, which he is currently serving, a future sentence on a 24 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT - 1 1 murder conviction, or the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board’s decision not to parole him 2 from his rape sentence to his murder sentence (Dkt. 21). 3 Petitioner’s habeas petition refers the Court to a “Memorandum of Authorities.” Dkt. 11. 4 Instead of providing a memorandum of authorities specific to this petition, petitioner attaches 5 briefs from personal restraint petitions filed in state court (Dkt. 11-1 to 11-3). Petitioner has not 6 made it clear what conviction or Indeterminate Sentence Review Board decision he is 7 challenging. 8 The rules adopted by the Supreme Court governing petitions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 9 2254 requires a petitioner to specify all the grounds for relief available to petitioner, state the 10 facts supporting each ground, and state the relief requested. Rule 2(c) states: 11 12 13 14 (c) Form. The petition must: (1) specify all the grounds for relief available to the petitioner; (2) state the facts supporting each ground; (3) state the relief requested; (4) be printed, typewritten, or legibly handwritten; and (5) be signed under penalty of perjury by the petitioner or by a person authorized to sign it for the petitioner under 28 U.S.C. § 2242. 15 See, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rule 2(c), 28 U.S.C.A. foll. § 2254. Petitioner simply 16 referencing briefs filed in state court is confusing and does not suffice in this case. The Court 17 notes that petitioner titled his petition as a petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2241. However, 18 if petitioner is seeking to challenge the validity of either of his state convictions or sentences the 19 petition is properly filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. 20 The Court grants respondent’s motion for a more definite statement and orders petitioner 21 to submit a new petition using the form provided by the Court. Petitioner must completely fill 22 out the form and not simply reference other documents. Petitioner is ordered to title this petition 23 24 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT - 2 1 “First Amended Petition.” Petitioner’s first amended petition must be filed on or before March 6, 2 2015. 3 The Clerk’s Office is directed to send petition a form for filing a state habeas corpus 4 petition. 5 Dated this 20th day of January, 2015. A 6 7 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?