Nelson v. Colvin

Filing 25

ORDER reversing and remanding case by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 8 9 10 ROBI R NELSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. Civil No. 3:14-CV-05752-RSM 13 ORDER CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings in regard to Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. On remand, an administrative law judge (ALJ) shall update the record, hold a de novo hearing, and issue a new decision. 20 21 22 23 On remand, the ALJ will offer Plaintiff a new hearing, reconsider and properly address all medical source assessments or opinions, reconsider and properly address the lay witnesses’ statements, reconsider Plaintiff’s credibility, reassess Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity and in so doing provide rationale with specific citation to the record, in support of the assessment. In 24 Page 1 ORDER OF REMAND - [3:14-CV-05752-RSM] 1 particular, the ALJ will make findings regarding Plaintiff’s need for bathroom breaks, the 2 number of bathroom breaks required, and will provide her rationale for these findings. If 3 necessary, the ALJ will obtain supplemental medical and vocational expert testimony, and will 4 issue a new decision. 5 Plaintiff will be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 6 2412(d), upon proper request to this Court. 7 8 DATED this 14th day of April, 2015. 9 /s/ Ricardo S. Martinez HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Page 2 ORDER OF REMAND - [3:14-CV-05752-RSM]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?