Mahone v. McCarthy et al

Filing 18

ORDER RE-NOTING Plaintiff's 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel to 1/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 SYLVESTER JAMES MAHONE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. PAT MCCARTHY, PAUL PASTOR, EDDIE PARKER, BALDEROMA, MARVIN SPENCER, MARTHA KARR, DANIELS, KATHY MILLER, CARN, CASE NO. C14-5812 BHS-JRC ORDER RE-NOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 15 Defendants. 16 17 The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action to United States 18 Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and local 19 Magistrate Judge Rules MJR1, MJR3 and MJR4. 20 Currently before the Court is plaintiff’s “ex-parte” motion for appointment of counsel 21 (Dkt. 6). Plaintiff filed his motion prior to any defendant appearing in the action. Because no 22 defendant had appeared, plaintiff he did not serve his motion on them. Accordingly, the Pierce 23 County Prosecutor’s Office has not responded to this motion. The defendants’ filed their notice 24 of appearance after plaintiff filed his motion (Dkt. 8). ORDER RE-NOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL - 1 1 The Court will not consider this motion for appointment of counsel as an ex-parte 2 motion. Defendants are entitled to the opportunity to respond. The Court re-notes plaintiff’s 3 motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. 6), for January 23, 2015. Defendants’ response is due 4 on or before January 16, 2013. 5 Dated this 22nd day of December, 2014. A 6 7 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER RE-NOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?