Hughes v. Colvin
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Motion to Remand by Judge Karen L Strombom. This case is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).(MET)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TACOMA DIVISION
8
9
10
DONNA KAY HUGHES,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
Civil No. 3:14-CV-05924-KLS
13
ORDER ON REMAND
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned
case be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further
administrative proceedings, including, but not limited to, the following actions: the
administrative law judge (the ALJ) will further evaluate the severity of Plaintiff’s mental
impairments; the ALJ will reevaluate the opinions of Dr. Dixon (Tr. 327-331), Dr. Clifford (Tr.
85-86, 89-90), and Dr. Gollogly (Tr. 98-99, 102-103); the ALJ will reevaluate Plaintiff’s
subjective complaints; the ALJ will reassess Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity; the ALJ will
further determine whether Plaintiff can perform the physical and mental demands of her past
relevant work; and, if warranted, the ALJ will obtain evidence from a vocational expert to clarify
24
Page 1
ORDER - [3:14-CV-05924-KLS]
1
the effect of the assessed limitations on the occupational base at step five.
2
This case is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
3
4
DATED this 16th day of April, 2015.
5
A
6
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
Presented by:
11
s/ Daphne Banay
DAPHNE BANAY
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A
Seattle, WA 98104-7075
Telephone: (206) 615-2113
Fax: (206) 615-2531
daphne.banay@ssa.gov
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Page 2
ORDER - [3:14-CV-05924-KLS]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?