Frazey v. Colvin
Filing
28
ORDER that the above captioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TACOMA DIVISION
8
9
10
NICOLETTE CLARICE FRAZEY,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
Civil No. 3:14-CV-05948-KLS
13
ORDER ON REMAND
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned
case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to afford the claimant an opportunity to appear and testify at an
administrative hearing; update and reassess the medical evidence of record; reevaluate the
medical opinions; reevaluate claimant’s credibility; reevaluate the claimant’s residual functional
capacity, taking into account all severe and non-severe impairments; and perform a new step four
and five analysis, including obtaining additional vocational expert testimony, if necessary.
23
24
Page 1
ORDER - [3:14-CV-05948-KLS]
1
The ALJ will make a de novo determination as to disability, and issue a new decision.
2
Upon proper application, Plaintiff shall be eligible for attorneys’ fees and expenses under
3
the Equal Access to Justice Act, 24 U.S.C. § 2412 et seq.
4
5
DATED this 27th day of May, 2015.
A
6
7
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
Presented by:
11
s/ Erin F. Highland
ERIN F. HIGHLAND
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A
Seattle, WA 98104-7075
Telephone: (206) 615-2495
Fax: (206) 615-2531
erin.highland@ssa.gov
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Page 2
ORDER - [3:14-CV-05948-KLS]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?