United States of America v. Gibney et al
Filing
15
ORDER denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Elaine Gibney. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC) (cc: Gibney via mail)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS
FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
11 ELAINE GIBNEY,
12
CASE NO. C14-5969 BHS
C14-5970BHS
Defendant.
13
14
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Elaine Gibney’s (“Gibney”)
15 motions for a court appointed counsel (C14-5969, Dkt. 11 & C14-5970, Dkt. 10).
16
On December 30, 2014, Gibney filed the instant motions requesting that the court
17 appoint her counsel in these forfeiture proceedings because she is unable to afford
18 counsel. Id. Although a court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), can request counsel to
19 represent a party, the court may do so only in exceptional circumstances. Rand v.
20 Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997). A finding of exceptional circumstances
21 requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of
22
ORDER - 1
1 the party to articulate her claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues
2 involved. Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986).
3
In this case, the Court is unable to conclude that exceptional circumstances exist to
4 appoint counsel to represent Gibney. In her letter, Gibney states that her claims and/or
5 defenses are more equitable in nature rather than being legal in nature. She asserts that
6 the funds that the Government is attempting to seize are essential sources of income and
7 that she is diligently striving to make her restitution payments. These are not complex
8 claims and Gibney has filed detailed financial documents for the Court’s consideration.
9 Therefore, the Court DENIES Gibney’s motions for appointment of counsel.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated this 3rd day of February, 2015.
A
12
13
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?