Dean v. Colvin
Filing
23
ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS, adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
9
10
11
RUTHE ELAINE DEAN,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. C15-5031-RJB
ORDER REVERSING AND
REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
The Court, after careful consideration of the plaintiff’s complaint, the parties’ briefs, all
papers and exhibits filed in support and opposition thereto, the Report and Recommendation
(Dkt. 22) of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, and the
21
22
23
remainder of the file herein; and finding no objection by either party to the Report and
Recommendation, does hereby find and ORDER:
24
(1)
The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
25
(2)
The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is
26
REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings:
PAGE - 1
a. To re-evaluate the testimony of examining psychologist, Dr. David Dixon,
requesting further opinion testimony if needed;
1
2
b. To re-evaluate the testimony of examining physician, Dr. Mark Heilbrunn,
requesting further opinion testimony if needed;
3
4
c. To re-evaluate (1) Plaintiff’s Residual Functioning Capacity findings and (2)
Step Five findings, in light of the re-evaluated testimony of Dr. David Dixon
and Dr. Mark Heilbrunn.
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to
Judge Donohue.
DATED this 19th day of October, 2015.
11
13
A
14
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge
12
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?